1984
DOI: 10.1109/tei.1984.298741
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electrical Conduction and Carrier Traps in Polymeric Materials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

18
99
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 266 publications
(117 citation statements)
references
References 87 publications
18
99
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using our data we then obtain a prefactor 0 Ϸ750 cm 2 /V s and an excess electron mobility of Ϸ2ϫ10 Ϫ3 cm 2 /V s. Note that the present energy resolution produces an uncertainty in the mobility of about one order of magnitude ͑due to the exponential factor͒. This value compares favorably with the reported values in PE, which is in the range 10 Ϫ3 -10 Ϫ10 cm 2 /V s. 68 It has been suggested 69 that the striking range of variation of the mobility values reported by various investigators is mainly due to the different measurement procedures adopted, and in particular to the measurement time for each particular experiment. When the conduction takes place over very long times, carrier trapping and therefore space charge formation become dominant, providing the lowest values of the apparent mobility.…”
Section: Amorphous Pesupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Using our data we then obtain a prefactor 0 Ϸ750 cm 2 /V s and an excess electron mobility of Ϸ2ϫ10 Ϫ3 cm 2 /V s. Note that the present energy resolution produces an uncertainty in the mobility of about one order of magnitude ͑due to the exponential factor͒. This value compares favorably with the reported values in PE, which is in the range 10 Ϫ3 -10 Ϫ10 cm 2 /V s. 68 It has been suggested 69 that the striking range of variation of the mobility values reported by various investigators is mainly due to the different measurement procedures adopted, and in particular to the measurement time for each particular experiment. When the conduction takes place over very long times, carrier trapping and therefore space charge formation become dominant, providing the lowest values of the apparent mobility.…”
Section: Amorphous Pesupporting
confidence: 78%
“…To understand the sandwich-structured nanocomposites with different layer arrangements, it is informative to investigate the conduction mechanisms of its components, i.e., c-BCB/BNNS and c-BCB/BT, under elevated temperatures. Several conduction mechanisms exist in polymeric materials, including the hopping conduction, the Schottky charge injection (thermionic emission) and the PooleFrenkel (P-F) emission (20,25). Hopping conduction is commonly observed in amorphous polymers such as c-BCB, as we previously demonstrated (8).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…However, it is noteworthy that a systemic study on high field electrical conduction of polymeric nanocomposite is still lack; especially the characteristics of charge transportation and conduction under a high electrical field have rarely been reported. It is well known that microscopic structures, such as the density, crystallinity of a composite, the size of the filler and the morphology of interfaces between the polymer matrix and the filler, have great effects on the electrical conduction in the composite (6)- (9) . Conduction current measurement in insulating materials have been confirmed to be a significant way that it not only provides fundamental data for commercial application, but also obtains complementary information on the processes of charge injection, transportation and conduction mechanism, which is very helpful to understand the relationship between chemical-physical-microstructure and electrical properties, and propose theoretical instruction to design and develop a new material (10) .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%