2015 IEEE 42nd Photovoltaic Specialist Conference (PVSC) 2015
DOI: 10.1109/pvsc.2015.7356150
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electrical conductivity across InP and GaAs wafer-bonded structures with miscut substrates

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In subsequent publications, the role of relative miscut was shown to be important as well, with an increased difference in miscut between the two bonding faces leading to increased interface resistance. More recent results (5) showed that bonded n-InP/ n-InP, albeit at a higher doping concentration, led to reduced interface resistance (0.005 Ω⋅cm 2 ) compared to n-GaAs / n-GaAs. Interestingly, n-GaAs / n-InP interfaces showed interface resistances that were very similar to n-InP / n-InP and, therefore, much lower than n-GaAs / n-GaAs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In subsequent publications, the role of relative miscut was shown to be important as well, with an increased difference in miscut between the two bonding faces leading to increased interface resistance. More recent results (5) showed that bonded n-InP/ n-InP, albeit at a higher doping concentration, led to reduced interface resistance (0.005 Ω⋅cm 2 ) compared to n-GaAs / n-GaAs. Interestingly, n-GaAs / n-InP interfaces showed interface resistances that were very similar to n-InP / n-InP and, therefore, much lower than n-GaAs / n-GaAs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Processing treatments could be efficiently optimized to obtain, for example, improved electronic transport properties under limited thermal budgets. Previous work has demonstrated bonding of III-V materials, to form both homojunctions and heterojunctions, by employing aqueous-sulfur (1)(2)(3) or elemental sulfur (1,4) passivation methods. However, a high-temperature anneal step is required to form a sufficiently strong bonded interface between the two materials.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this work, the effect of rotational misorientation (twist) on the electronic properties across the bonded interface was studied by fabricating InP homojunctions. This work in addition to our previous work on the effect of tilt misorientation (6) provides insight as to which crystallographic factors most strongly impact bonding and electronic transport across the interface. Furthermore, since the bonded interface is essentially a grain boundary, information obtained in wafer bonding experiments can also apply to polycrystalline systems where grain boundaries play a significant role in overall device performance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…To study the effect of rotation, on-axis (001) ± 0.1° n-type InP wafers with twist angles ranging from 0° to 90° in 15 increments were bonded. To study the role of relative tilt, (001) n-type GaAs and (001) n-type InP wafers with offcut angles of 4° towards <111>A and on-axis substrates were bonded to form relative tilts of 0°, 4°, and 8° (6). Currentvoltage (I-V) curves were measured at various temperatures ranging from 90 K to 340 K to determine the interfacial barrier heights using the Seager and Pike electron model (3,(6)(7)(8).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation