2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.measurement.2021.109401
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electrical conductivity effect on the performance evaluation of EIT systems: A review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Applications Industry construction [7], process [9]- [14], material condition monitoring [15] Biomedical lung [5], [16]- [19], demodulation [20], heart [8], cell culture [21] Geophysics [3] Reconstruction quality methods [22]- [25], Machine learning methods [26],…”
Section: Type Articlesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Applications Industry construction [7], process [9]- [14], material condition monitoring [15] Biomedical lung [5], [16]- [19], demodulation [20], heart [8], cell culture [21] Geophysics [3] Reconstruction quality methods [22]- [25], Machine learning methods [26],…”
Section: Type Articlesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to solve the drawbacks of the conventional modalities, electrical impedance tomography (EIT) is an alternative to detect whole breast cancer [8,9] which is non-invasive [10] and provides realtime information that utilizes electrical current to measure conductivity changes, breast tissues crosssectional [11,12]. EIT explores electrical conductivity at various frequencies to monitor the human body [13] such as arm [14] and calf [15] compartments, gastric shape [16], albumin accumulation [17], and sodium imaging [18]. However, conventional EIT for breast cancer detection has shortcomings related to spatial resolution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…EIT has the capability to reconstruct conductivity particle distribution of a region of interest utilizing material conductivity properties [10] based on the electrical properties of the higher σ Cu than σ Al and σ Water . However, EIT has a drawback to detect the minor Cu particles due to detection on the outside of the sensitivity sensing area of EIT [11], which produces a weaker signal to detect the minor Cu particles, resulting in blurry images. Hence, in order to improve the image reconstruction quality of EIT, machine learning techniques were proposed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%