2022
DOI: 10.1039/d2nr04112j
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electrical conductivity of a single parallel contact between carbon nanotubes

Abstract: In situ measurements of the electrical resistance of a parallel contact between carbon nanotubes were performed. The electrical conductivities of individual nanotubes and the interface were derived by varying the contact length systematically.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Given that ρ, L , and d in were constant, L = 360 nm, and d in = 3.6 nm (obtained via TEM imaging), we derived ρ from the difference between two measurement points (difference between the values of R measured for two different values of d out ), as the unknown parameter ( R 0 ) was canceled. The estimated electrical resistivity (ρ) was ∼6 × 10 –6 Ω·m (σ ≈ 2 × 10 5 S/m) for the MWCNT shown in Figure , which showed good agreement with a previously reported value . The dashed line in Figure (d) represents eq for ρ = 6.3 × 10 –6 Ω·m.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Given that ρ, L , and d in were constant, L = 360 nm, and d in = 3.6 nm (obtained via TEM imaging), we derived ρ from the difference between two measurement points (difference between the values of R measured for two different values of d out ), as the unknown parameter ( R 0 ) was canceled. The estimated electrical resistivity (ρ) was ∼6 × 10 –6 Ω·m (σ ≈ 2 × 10 5 S/m) for the MWCNT shown in Figure , which showed good agreement with a previously reported value . The dashed line in Figure (d) represents eq for ρ = 6.3 × 10 –6 Ω·m.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The estimated electrical resistivity (ρ) was ∼6 × 10 −6 Ω•m (σ ≈ 2 × 10 5 S/m) for the MWCNT shown in Figure 3, which showed good agreement with a previously reported value. 23 The dashed line in Figure 3(d) represents eq 1 for ρ = 6.3 × 10 −6 Ω•m. The good agreement with the experimental data supported the validity of the diameter-independent electrical resistivity of MWCNTs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations