2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2004.08.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electrical conductivity of chemically modified multiwalled carbon nanotube/epoxy composites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

15
268
2
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 586 publications
(286 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
15
268
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In agreement with our previous findings, both as-received and oxidized nanotubes exhibit a negative potential being lower for the oxidized nanotubes. It is noteworthy that our results show lower values than those reported by Bae et al [43] and are similar to those found by Kim et al [15], who used a more aggressive oxidation treatment (1 h at 100 C with 40% HNO 3 ); however, z-potential values are higher than those reported by Hu [44], who used very long treatment periods in the presence of HNO 3 .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In agreement with our previous findings, both as-received and oxidized nanotubes exhibit a negative potential being lower for the oxidized nanotubes. It is noteworthy that our results show lower values than those reported by Bae et al [43] and are similar to those found by Kim et al [15], who used a more aggressive oxidation treatment (1 h at 100 C with 40% HNO 3 ); however, z-potential values are higher than those reported by Hu [44], who used very long treatment periods in the presence of HNO 3 .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…The surface electric potential could be characterized by z-potential measurements. In this context, Kim et al [15] reported that z-potential of pristine nanotubes exhibited a positive value, whereas oxidized nanotubes using HNO 3 were negatively charged, and the absolute value increased with the strength of the oxidation process. z-potential values for our commercial and oxidized FWNTs are presented in Table 3.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The presence of bromine caused the formation of ionic and covalent bonds with the matrix, improving the flexibility of the composites, and the electrical conductivity. However, some studies [25,[48][49][50] have shown that the surface functionalisation of GNP can also decrease the electrical properties of the nanocomposites compared to when unmodified GNP is used. As the electron displacement is known to occur mainly on the surface of graphene, highly functionalising the surface might increase the mechanical properties but decrease the electrical properties of the final product.…”
Section: Functionalisationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 and 4). As a result of this, many layers that MWCNTs are built from, are much more rigid than that of SWCNTs 23,24 .…”
Section: Multi-walled Carbon Nanotubesmentioning
confidence: 99%