2020
DOI: 10.1007/s00410-020-01688-y
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electrical conductivity of tremolite under high temperature and pressure: implications for the high-conductivity anomalies in the Earth and Venus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
33
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
4
33
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We also noted that the electrical conductivity of our diopside-tremolite-albite sample is higher than that of pure clinopyroxene (Yang et al, 2011) or pure tremolite (Shen et al, 2020) by a factor of 10 3 -10 4 , especially when the temperature is lower than 1000 K (Figure 3). These electrical conductivity experiments on clinopyroxene, plagioclase, and amphibole were conducted at different pressures.…”
mentioning
confidence: 69%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We also noted that the electrical conductivity of our diopside-tremolite-albite sample is higher than that of pure clinopyroxene (Yang et al, 2011) or pure tremolite (Shen et al, 2020) by a factor of 10 3 -10 4 , especially when the temperature is lower than 1000 K (Figure 3). These electrical conductivity experiments on clinopyroxene, plagioclase, and amphibole were conducted at different pressures.…”
mentioning
confidence: 69%
“…However, a recent experimental study found that the electrical conductivity of tremolite amphibole is much lower than previously thought, about 10 3 -10 5 lower than that of hornblendite. It only exceeds the conductivity of olivine by one order of magnitude at temperatures <1123 K, i.e., the melting temperature (Shen et al, 2020). Therefore, the role of amphiboles in the electrical conductivity of the mantle is ambiguous and it certainly requires further study.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The light orange region corresponds to the high electrical conductivity of subduction zones from MT observations. The purple solid line represents the electrical conductivity of amphibole at 2.0 GPa (Hu et al, 2018), the magenta dotted line represents the conductivity of epidote (Hu et al, 2017), the light blue hatched region and light blue dashed line indicate the conductivity of antigorite (Reynard et al, 2011; Wang et al, 2017), the red solid line denotes the conductivity of talc (Wang & Karato, 2013), the green dashed line and orange hatched region represent the conductivity of lawsonite (Manthilake et al, 2015; Pommier et al, 2019), the green solid line is the electrical conductivity of chlorite (Manthilake et al, 2016), the gray and pink hatched regions are the electrical conductivity of talc rocks and serpentinite at 3.0 GPa, respectively (X. Guo et al, 2011), and the wine red dashed line is the electrical conductivity of tremolite (Shen et al, 2020). Note that Amp = amphibole, Atg = antigorite, Chl = chlorite, Epi = epidote, Law = lawsonite, Srp = serpentinite, Tr = tremolite, and Tlc = talc.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a first approximation, by neglecting the contribution of the low-frequency features and any deviation of the experimental data from the semicircular shape, a single R-CPE equivalent circuit could be roughly used to model the mica samples and derive their total (bulk) conductivity as a function of temperature. Oversimplified approaches as the aforementioned one and even the simpler R-C circuit in parallel have often been used to estimate the bulk conductivity of minerals [50][51][52]. However, as the recorded impedance spectra of the mica samples exhibit more complicated spectral features, we are obliged to analyze them in more detail, in order to separate different contributions to the overall bulk conductivity.…”
Section: Experimental Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%