2002
DOI: 10.1186/bcr476
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electrical impedance scanning: a new imaging technique for evaluating microcalcification in the breast?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Though hopes were high for EIS, studies show contradictory results. Although Kneeshaw et al [ 104 ] found that “EIS is able to differentiate malignant from benign disease associated with clinically occult microcalcification,” Wersebe et al [ 105 ] called the diagnostic accuracy of the scan “mediocre.” Melloul et al [ 102 ] decided that EIS, with its 72.2% sensitivity and 67% specificity, did not improve the detection rate of breast cancer when combined with 99m Tc-SSM. In another study, EIS yielded a false-positive rate comparable with that of mammography [ 106 ].…”
Section: Experimental Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Though hopes were high for EIS, studies show contradictory results. Although Kneeshaw et al [ 104 ] found that “EIS is able to differentiate malignant from benign disease associated with clinically occult microcalcification,” Wersebe et al [ 105 ] called the diagnostic accuracy of the scan “mediocre.” Melloul et al [ 102 ] decided that EIS, with its 72.2% sensitivity and 67% specificity, did not improve the detection rate of breast cancer when combined with 99m Tc-SSM. In another study, EIS yielded a false-positive rate comparable with that of mammography [ 106 ].…”
Section: Experimental Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The viability of electrical impedance measurements to assist the clinician in the diagnosis of breast cancer is clearly still under intense investigation. Some recent clinical studies, such as the work by Wersebe and colleagues [ 21 ] and Kneeshaw and colleagues [ 22 ], again provide conflicting results. Wersebe and colleagues concluded that EIS does not improve diagnostic accuracy, while Kneeshaw and colleagues found favorable results in the ability of EIS to detect occult microcalcification in the breast.…”
Section: Electrical Impedance Scanningmentioning
confidence: 99%