“…Yet, these methods are advantageous because the muscle's origin is preserved, its orientation is largely conserved, and an intact blood supply maintains the viability of the muscle (Bach-yRita and Ito, 1966;Barmack et al, 1971;Hanson and Lennerstrand, 1977;Shall and Goldberg, 1992;Dimitrova et al, 2002;Shall et al, 2003). The relative ease of in vitro preparations for the determination of extraocular muscle force is reflected by their extensive use (Close and Luff, 1974;Luff, 1981;Chiarandini, 1980Chiarandini, , 1987Asmussen and Gaunitz, 1981;Jacoby et al, 1989;Chen and von Bartheld, 2004;McLoon et al, 2006;Anderson et al, 2006). While in vitro methods have the advantage of being technically less demanding and do not require general anesthesia, they may not be optimal for obtaining accurate contractile measurements of extraocular muscle.…”