2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2007.02.146
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electrical properties of the Sr2Ru1−xTixO4 solid solutions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The unit-cell and positional parameters obtained from neutron diffraction data measured by the Echidna diffractometer at 298 K agree with those from synchrotron X-ray diffraction data at 300 K, from TOF SuperHRPD and iMATERIA neutron data at RT, and from DFT calculations. The present refined crystal parameters of LaSrAlO 4 and Sr 2 TiO 4 are consistent with those presented in the literature. , For LaSrAlO 4 ( A = La,Sr and B = Al), the B –(apical oxygen atom O2) distance, d ( B –O2) (2.0535(16) Å) is longer than that of B –(equatorial oxygen atom O1) (1.87832(3) Å) ( B = Al): [ d ( B –O2)/ d ( B –O1) = 1.0932(9) > 1]. For Sr 2 TiO 4 ( A = Sr and B = Ti), the B –O2 distance (1.981(3) Å) is nearly equal to that of B –O1 (1.94328(4) Å): [ d ( B –O2)/ d ( B –O1) = 1.0194(15)].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The unit-cell and positional parameters obtained from neutron diffraction data measured by the Echidna diffractometer at 298 K agree with those from synchrotron X-ray diffraction data at 300 K, from TOF SuperHRPD and iMATERIA neutron data at RT, and from DFT calculations. The present refined crystal parameters of LaSrAlO 4 and Sr 2 TiO 4 are consistent with those presented in the literature. , For LaSrAlO 4 ( A = La,Sr and B = Al), the B –(apical oxygen atom O2) distance, d ( B –O2) (2.0535(16) Å) is longer than that of B –(equatorial oxygen atom O1) (1.87832(3) Å) ( B = Al): [ d ( B –O2)/ d ( B –O1) = 1.0932(9) > 1]. For Sr 2 TiO 4 ( A = Sr and B = Ti), the B –O2 distance (1.981(3) Å) is nearly equal to that of B –O1 (1.94328(4) Å): [ d ( B –O2)/ d ( B –O1) = 1.0194(15)].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Powder X-ray diffraction patterns of the Sr 2 TiO 4 reaction intermediates and products after the initial aerobic heating at 1100 °C for 6 h (black) and after an additional 21 h (red). The reference diffraction patterns of SrO (S), TiO 2 -R (R), SrTiO 3 (∞), Sr 2 TiO 4 (1), and Sr 3 Ti 2 O 7 (2) are from the literature. ,,,, …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reference diffraction patterns of SrO (S), TiO 2 -R (R), SrTiO 3 (∞), Sr 2 TiO 4 (1), and Sr 3 Ti 2 O 7 (2) are from the literature 15,32,36,37…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All RP phases in table 2, including the prototypical perovskite when treated as n = 0, demonstrate a direct proportionality between complexity and amount of layers: I G ∝ n (R 2 = 0.998). In contrast to the ABX 3 compounds with fluorides, which typically adapt the perovskite structure, (Natarajan et al, 1978), c (Miwa et al, 2007), d (Kruglik et al, 1989), e (Lukaszewicz, 1959), f (Villars & Cenzual, 2012a), g (Villars & Cenzual, 2012b), h , i , j (Teske & Müller-Buschbaum, 1971), k (Teske & Müller-Buschbaum, 1969), l (Gutau & Müller-Buschbaum, 1990).…”
Section: Ruddlesden-popper Seriesmentioning
confidence: 99%