2018
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4939-8897-6_2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electrical Pulse Stimulation of Primary Human Skeletal Muscle Cells

Abstract: Electrical pulse stimulation (EPS) is an in vitro method of inducing contractions in cultured skeletal muscle cells of human and animal origin. Motor neuron activation of muscle fibres can be replaced by applying EPS on differentiated skeletal muscle cells (myotubes) in culture [1,2]. Here we describe two protocols for EPS of human myotubes in 6-well plates: acute, highfrequency (single bipolar pulses of 2 ms, 100 Hz for 200 ms every 5 th sec for 5-60 min, 10-30 This is a post-peer-review, pre-copyedit version… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In EPS protocol 1, the myotubes were differentiated for 6 days, washed three times with PBS, and the media were changed to serum-free differentiation media before a single, bipolar pulses of 2 ms, with voltage 10 V and frequency 0.1 Hz were applied continuously for 24 h using a C-Dish™ carbon electrode connected to a C-Pace EP multi-channel culture pacer (IonOptix, Dublin, Ireland). In EPS protocol 2, the cells were differentiated for 5 days and exposed to EPS with 2 ms pulse duration, 30 V intensity, and frequency 1 Hz for the last 48 h of differentiation as previously described ( Nikolić et al, 2019 ). In both protocols, control myotubes cultured on 6-well CelBIND ® microplates were fitted with a C-Dish™ carbon electrode without connecting the C-Dish to the pulse generator.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In EPS protocol 1, the myotubes were differentiated for 6 days, washed three times with PBS, and the media were changed to serum-free differentiation media before a single, bipolar pulses of 2 ms, with voltage 10 V and frequency 0.1 Hz were applied continuously for 24 h using a C-Dish™ carbon electrode connected to a C-Pace EP multi-channel culture pacer (IonOptix, Dublin, Ireland). In EPS protocol 2, the cells were differentiated for 5 days and exposed to EPS with 2 ms pulse duration, 30 V intensity, and frequency 1 Hz for the last 48 h of differentiation as previously described ( Nikolić et al, 2019 ). In both protocols, control myotubes cultured on 6-well CelBIND ® microplates were fitted with a C-Dish™ carbon electrode without connecting the C-Dish to the pulse generator.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…“ In vitro exercise models”, using myotubes contracting in response to the application of electric pulse stimulation (EPS) 1 , have been widely utilized for investigating the impacts of actual contractile activity on muscle cell properties including exercise-inducible myokine secretion 2 , hypertrophy 3 , sarcomere lesions 4 and beneficial anti-lipotoxicity effects 5 . Although most prior studies used murine muscle cell lines such as mouse C2C12 cells 68 , several investigations have also been conducted using human muscle cells and provided compelling evidence that “ in vitro exercise models” are potentially applicable not only to murine muscle cells but also muscle cells obtained from human subjects 3,915 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To directly analyse the movement of proteins following contraction, confocal microscopy has been employed within various skeletal muscle systems [55][56][57]. To detect a specific protein, a fluorescent tag is inserted into the coding region of the gene leading to the expression of a protein containing a conjugated tag that is detectable via absorption and emission of specific wavelengths of light [58].…”
Section: Electrical Stimulated Contraction and Microscopymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, fluorescent tags can often bind together and aggregate leading to incorrect localisation and cellular toxicity [59]. The main drawback of this system is the inability of it to be utilised within in vivo muscle, with imaging only possible in ex vivo and in vitro skeletal muscle systems that contract through electrical stimulation [55,60]. While visible myotubule shortening occurs with electrical stimulation, it is debatable whether this process is equivalent to that of contraction within in vivo tissue, with several important biomarkers of mitochondrial biogenesis unchanged [61].…”
Section: Electrical Stimulated Contraction and Microscopymentioning
confidence: 99%