2019
DOI: 10.1103/physreve.100.033202
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electrical resistivity calculations in dense plasmas

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In our precedent work on aluminum, the correction δη resulting from this extension was essential to explain experimental aluminum isobaric electrical conductivities. The other curves in Figure 1 reproduce the results of other studies, among which AA calculations with different choices for Z * , xc functional or ionic structure factor S(k) [13,14]. For information, we also reported other type of calculations like those based on mean-force scattering models [15,16], giving results comparable to AA ones.…”
Section: Ziman Formula and The Average-atom Modelsupporting
confidence: 79%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In our precedent work on aluminum, the correction δη resulting from this extension was essential to explain experimental aluminum isobaric electrical conductivities. The other curves in Figure 1 reproduce the results of other studies, among which AA calculations with different choices for Z * , xc functional or ionic structure factor S(k) [13,14]. For information, we also reported other type of calculations like those based on mean-force scattering models [15,16], giving results comparable to AA ones.…”
Section: Ziman Formula and The Average-atom Modelsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Red line: our work [1]. Other lines: other Average-Atom results: Perrot and Dharmawardana [13], Faussurier and Blancard [14], approaches based on the mean-force scattering concept (Shaffer and Starrett [16], Sperling et al The impact of the exchange-correlation functional on aluminum's dc conductivity at solid density ρ 0 = 2.7 g/cm 3 is illustrated by the black curves (PDW: Perrot-Dharma-wardana [25,26], KS: Kohn-Sham [27]), that of the ion charge Z * by the blue line, and the impact of the ionic structure factor S(k) (OCP: One-Component Plasma, Rinker: Equation ( 28)) by the green ones. The red curve is our result for Z * = Z cont , Karasiev et al's exchange-correlation functional [9], and HyperNetted-Chain ionic structure factor.…”
Section: Effect Of Mean Ionization On DC Conductivity Within Ziman's ...mentioning
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The other curves in Figure 1 reproduce the results of other studies, among which AA calculations with different choices for Z *, xc functional or ionic structure factor S ( k ). [ 14,15 ] For information, we also reported other types of calculations like those based on mean‐force scattering models, [ 16,17 ] giving results comparable to AA ones. The neutral pseudo‐atom (NPA) calculation of Dharma‐wardana et al, [ 6 ] represented by the blue dashed curve, differs by the use of other boundary conditions.…”
Section: Ziman Formula and The Average‐atom Modelmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…[ 13 ] Red line: our work. [ 1 ] Other lines: other average‐atom results: Perrot and Dharma‐wardana, [ 14 ] Faussurier and Blancard, [ 15 ] approaches based on the mean‐force scattering concept (Shaffer and Starrett, [ 16 ] Sperling et al [ 17 ] ), and Neutral Pseudo‐Atom (NPA) model of Dharma‐wardana et al [ 6 ]…”
Section: Ziman Formula and The Average‐atom Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%