“…Over the last decades, methods to study the electric resistivity of the subsurface -such as magnetotellurics (e.g., Muñoz et al, 2018or Blecha et al, 2018 and electrical resistivity tomography (ERT; e.g., Storz et al, 2000;Schütze and Flechsig, 2002;Schmidt-Hattenberger et al, 2013) -have proven to be especially useful when fluids are involved, as T. Nickschick et al: Large-scale ERT in the Cheb Basin they are used as efficient techniques for noninvasive imaging of subsurface structures. A multitude of experiments that focus on carbon dioxide in particular have been carried out, mainly at carbon capture and storage sites, which are typically well explored and where the fluid injection system is controllable (Carrigan et al, 2013;Nakatsuka et al, 2010;Schmidt-Hattenberger et al, 2013;Bergmann et al, 2017). However, when it comes to natural CO 2 emanation sites, such as volcanically or magmatically active areas, this is often not the case: the fluid system can often be very complex and variable in space and time, hence requiring special approaches (Finizola et al, 2009;Pettinelli et al, 2010;Revil et al, 2008Revil et al, , 2011Gresse et al, 2017).…”