2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.06.037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electrical source dynamics in three functional localizer paradigms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
45
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 116 publications
(162 reference statements)
2
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been shown to give similar results to boundary element head models (Guggisberg et al, 2011). Numerous experimental and clinical studies have shown that this model provides reliable and accurate estimations of intracranial currents (Brodbeck et al, 2009, 2011; Groening et al, 2009; Vulliemoz et al, 2009; Plomp et al, 2010). …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been shown to give similar results to boundary element head models (Guggisberg et al, 2011). Numerous experimental and clinical studies have shown that this model provides reliable and accurate estimations of intracranial currents (Brodbeck et al, 2009, 2011; Groening et al, 2009; Vulliemoz et al, 2009; Plomp et al, 2010). …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To localize the brain areas underlying crowding, we used the Local Auto Regressive Average inverse solution for EEG (LAURA, Grave de Peralta Menendez et al, 2001;Michel et al, 2004;Plomp et al, 2009Plomp et al, , 2010 as implemented in the Cartool software (Brunet et al, 2011). We used a model identical to Plomp et al (2009Plomp et al ( , 2010 with 4022 source points evenly placed in the MNI 152 brain template.…”
Section: Eeg Recording and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used a model identical to Plomp et al (2009Plomp et al ( , 2010 with 4022 source points evenly placed in the MNI 152 brain template. We performed the following procedure separately for each subject, condition, and frequency.…”
Section: Eeg Recording and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The corrected scalar value of the activity at each solution point and for each time frame were submitted to the same procedure as for the waveform analysis (i.e. time point-wise 2 x 4 repeated measures ANOVA with factor presentation (IP vs. RP) and section (S1 vs. S2 vs. S3 vs. S4); (see Ortigue et al, 2005;Plomp et al, 2010;Britz and Michel, 2010;Knebel et al, 2011). To reduce the risk of false positive results arising from multiple tests, we used a node-wise significance threshold of p-value < 0.01, a temporal criterion of >20 consecutive TFs (~39ms), and a spatial criterion of 15 contiguous solution points for significant effects.…”
Section: Source Estimations and Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%