2012
DOI: 10.1523/jneurosci.2609-12.2012
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electrical Stimulation of Human Fusiform Face-Selective Regions Distorts Face Perception

Abstract: Face-selective neural responses in the human fusiform gyrus have been widely examined. However, their causal role in human face perception is largely unknown. Here, we used a multimodal approach of electrocorticography (ECoG), high-resolution functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), and electrical brain stimulation (EBS) to directly investigate the causal role of face-selective neural responses of the fusiform gyrus (FG) in face perception in a patient implanted with subdural electrodes in the right infer… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

30
283
2
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 339 publications
(323 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
30
283
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The HFB classifiers also were the only ones with classification accuracy significantly above chance in every subject [permutation test, P < 0.05, false-discovery rate (FDR) corrected]. These findings corroborate previous work showing a high correspondence between HFB activity and local neuronal firing rate and with fMRI blood-oxygen level-dependent activity (42)(43)(44)(45)(46)(47). Because selectivity for the different stimulus classes/trial types was most prominent in the HFB band, we focused on HFB activity in subsequent analyses.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The HFB classifiers also were the only ones with classification accuracy significantly above chance in every subject [permutation test, P < 0.05, false-discovery rate (FDR) corrected]. These findings corroborate previous work showing a high correspondence between HFB activity and local neuronal firing rate and with fMRI blood-oxygen level-dependent activity (42)(43)(44)(45)(46)(47). Because selectivity for the different stimulus classes/trial types was most prominent in the HFB band, we focused on HFB activity in subsequent analyses.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…In subsequent analyses, based on task 2, we focused on pITG math sites that included the NFA sites. Also of note, the number/math-selective region described above is anatomically distinct from other category-selective regions within the VTC, such as the fusiform face area (FFA) (46) and the word form area (WFA), sites that responded selectively to letters in task 1 and/or to written memory statements in task 2 (Fig. S3).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Microstimulation of inferotemporal cortex in monkeys (45) and electrical brain stimulation in fusiform areas in humans (46) have suggested a causal role of the temporal cortex in face categorization and perception. Future studies using direct stimulation of the amygdala will be important to further determine the nature of its contribution to the subjective perception of facial emotion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, optogenetics have allowed the selective stimulation of neuronal subtypes in localized regions of animal brains [40] and assessing the effects of that stimulation on functional neural networks [41]. With the increasing use of research protocols to study effects of cortical stimulation in patients implanted with invasive electrodes for epilepsy monitoring, there has been recent resurgence of interest into the effects of cortical stimulation upon behaviour and perception [26,[42][43][44]. While most of the aforementioned work focused on the link between stimulation and changes in perception or behaviour (e.g.…”
Section: (D) Importance Of Information Flow In the Brainmentioning
confidence: 99%