2006
DOI: 10.1191/0269215506cr928oa
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electrical stimulation of wrist and fingers for sensory and functional recovery in acute hemiplegia

Abstract: The results of this study indicated that additional stimulation of the hand and fingers leads to an improved sensorimotor outcome immediately after the intervention.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A third possible shortcoming is the research paradigm of using NMES without the addition of volitional, task-specific functional training. [10][11][12][13]16,17,19,22,25 This separation has no apparent conceptual or evidence-based support. A few case-series 14,15,27 and a randomized controlled clinical trial that included 22 patients 21 combined the stimulation with both unimanual and bimanual task-oriented functional activities.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A third possible shortcoming is the research paradigm of using NMES without the addition of volitional, task-specific functional training. [10][11][12][13]16,17,19,22,25 This separation has no apparent conceptual or evidence-based support. A few case-series 14,15,27 and a randomized controlled clinical trial that included 22 patients 21 combined the stimulation with both unimanual and bimanual task-oriented functional activities.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Intervention studies to improve upper extremity recovery following stroke include increasing exercise duration and intensity, [3][4][5][6][7] focusing on task-specific training, 8,9 and enhancing training by surface neuromuscular electrical nerve stimulation. [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22] The clinical efficacy, as well as a number of inherent difficulties associated with the various therapeutic intervention options following stroke in general and upper extremity paralysis/paresis in particular, were recently reviewed. 23 Intense and taskoriented training was found to yield better upper extremity control, particularly in patients who demonstrated at least modest motor control prior to entering into a clinical trial.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Exemplarily 1.7 Hz TENS just above the somatosensory threshold, which is rather similar to single pulse stimulation, improved the movement velocity of the wrist, fingers and hand (Koesler, Dafotakis, Ameli, Fink, & Nowak, 2009). Also repeated electrical stimulation at 2 Hz and muscle intensity for 1 hour at 10 days, which is comparable to the parameters applied in whole hand stimulation protocols, improved the effects of this motor training on kinesthesia sense, hand functioning and hand movement (Yozbatiran, Donmez, Kayak, & Bozan, 2006 (Powell, Pandyan, Granat, Cameron, & Stott, 1999).…”
Section: Rts Induced Behavioral Effects On Motor Control and Possiblementioning
confidence: 48%
“…However, the results of studies assessing general measures of paralysis also show that lower frequency stimulation can influence some measures, like wrist extension, hand functioning and kinesthesia sense (Koesler et al, 2009;Yozbatiran et al, 2006).…”
Section: Rts Induced Behavioral Effects On Motor Control and Possiblementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation