2013
DOI: 10.1258/jmb.2012.012014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electrical treatment of spinal cord injuries in the 18th and 19th centuries

Abstract: Two centuries ago, electricity was being used for the treatment of paraplegia and trials were taking place in France. This study aims to identify cases of traumatic paraplegia treated with electricity in the 19th century in order to assess the therapeutic benefit. Only four such cases were identified, none with a complete transection of the spinal cord since these patients would have died from pressure sores and urinary tract infections. The personalities involved, William Gull, William Erb, Guillaume Duchenne… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 9 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consequently, established medical journals such as the British Medical Journal, the Lancet and other contemporary textbooks were consulted as was the domestic medicine literature. Finally, the authors deliberately excluded from their study other forms of treatment applied to cases of paralysis (electricity, water therapy, baths, bleeding/bloodletting, the administration of tonics, opiates, purgatives and laxatives) as these are previously documented [4][5][6][7].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, established medical journals such as the British Medical Journal, the Lancet and other contemporary textbooks were consulted as was the domestic medicine literature. Finally, the authors deliberately excluded from their study other forms of treatment applied to cases of paralysis (electricity, water therapy, baths, bleeding/bloodletting, the administration of tonics, opiates, purgatives and laxatives) as these are previously documented [4][5][6][7].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%