2019
DOI: 10.1021/acsaelm.9b00551
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electrically Controllable Spin States of Holes and Electrons in Organic Semiconductor Materials

Abstract: Elucidating hole and electron states in organic semiconductor materials is one of the important issues for both their fundamental science and device applications. However, the detailed charge states, in particular, their spin states, have not yet been fully elucidated from a microscopic viewpoint. Here we show electrically controllable spin states of holes and electrons in typical organic semiconductor materials, a polymer regioregular poly­(3-hexyl­thiophene) (RR-P3HT) and a small molecule pentacene, using el… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The difference of g-factors for the hole and electron in P3HT has been recently reported with the density functional theory (DFT) calculation. 43 The DFT calculations for P3HT indicate that the electron density on the sulfur atoms of the thiophene groups of the LUMO is greater than that on the sulfur atoms of the thiophenes of the HOMO. 43−45 The nonvanishing electron density on the sulfur atoms associated with the LUMO results in the electron g-factor being larger than the hole g-factor.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The difference of g-factors for the hole and electron in P3HT has been recently reported with the density functional theory (DFT) calculation. 43 The DFT calculations for P3HT indicate that the electron density on the sulfur atoms of the thiophene groups of the LUMO is greater than that on the sulfur atoms of the thiophenes of the HOMO. 43−45 The nonvanishing electron density on the sulfur atoms associated with the LUMO results in the electron g-factor being larger than the hole g-factor.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One reason may be the recombination between holes (positive polarons) in the PEDOT:PSS layer and leakage electrons injected from the cathode passed through the light-emitting layer by V bias ; we will discuss this first reason in more detail later. Another reason may be the formation of bipolarons by increasing the polaron density in the PEDOT:PSS layer 44 48 , where a bipolaron is the combination of two polarons and has no spin 44 48 . However, the latter reason will be ruled out later by the following results for OLEDs with MoO 3 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fabricated device was sealed into an ESR sample tube after wiring with Ag paste in a nitrogen-filled glove box (O 2 ≤ 0.5 ppm, H 2 O ≤ 0.5 ppm). The parts of the above-mentioned fabrication method have been described in the previous works 31 , 35 , 46 49 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Its correctness was also confirmed with 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) as another standard sample. The parts of the above-mentioned characterization method have been described in the previous works 30 35 , 46 49 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%