2012
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.85.073201
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electrically detected spin echoes of donor nuclei in silicon

Abstract: The ability to probe the spin properties of solid state systems electrically underlies a wide variety of emerging technology. Here, we demonstrate electrical readout of the nuclear spin states of phosphorus donors in silicon in the coherent regime with modified Hahn echo sequences. We find that, whilst the nuclear spins have electrically detected phase coherence times exceeding 2 ms, they are nonetheless limited by the artificially shortened lifetime of the probing donor electron.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
13
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
2
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These assumptions are realistic, for instance, in EDMR where echo-type signals have been observed. 33,34 Under such conditions it is also possible to affect the RP lifetimes by applying short mw-pulses. 43,49 Once the reactivity is low it can also be treated as a perturbation, which almost does not change the spin evolution but nevertheless transfers the RP singlet-state population, r SS (t), into the detectable quantity F(t).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These assumptions are realistic, for instance, in EDMR where echo-type signals have been observed. 33,34 Under such conditions it is also possible to affect the RP lifetimes by applying short mw-pulses. 43,49 Once the reactivity is low it can also be treated as a perturbation, which almost does not change the spin evolution but nevertheless transfers the RP singlet-state population, r SS (t), into the detectable quantity F(t).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method was originally proposed for triplet-state optically detected magnetic resonance. 31,32 Such pulse sequences were used in EDMR 33,34 and pronounced echo-type signals have been observed. Using the same concept it was possible to obtain more specific information about the systems under study and to observe the echo modulation 35 and pulsed Electron-Nuclear Double Resonance (ENDOR) signals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Electrically-detected magnetic resonance has been used with Si:P to sensitively probe nuclear spins with pulsed ENDOR at high 20,22 and low magnetic fields [80][81] . High magnetic fields have been used to polarize Si:P electron spins 82 and this has been transferred to nuclear spins with optical excitation 18 and entirely electrically 19 .…”
Section: X6 Electrically-detected Magnetic Resonance (Edmr)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This equilibrium polarization has been used to reach over 99.9% electronic polarization 18 at temperatures of 1.4 K, and some of this has been transferred to the 31 P nuclear spin, providing up to 68% nuclear polarization [18][19] . High fields up to 12 T have been used with EPR frequencies of up to 336 GHz 17,19 , and this has been combined with electrically detected EPR experiments to study devices with high sensitivity [17][18][19][20][21][22] . Si:P in very high magnetic fields (exceeding 30 T) has been studied with far-infrared spectroscopy at 2.2 K, providing an analogy for hydrogen on white dwarf stars 23 .…”
Section: X21 Qubit Initialization (Spin Polarization)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Electrical detection of orbital excitation is by orders of magnitude more sensitive than the optical technique (see also Refs. [8,9] for methods of electrical detection of spin resonances), enabling the detection of less than 10 5 electrons excited into the conduction band. It has the advantage that the sample is also the detector, enabling a unified theory of excitation and detection, which links the slow electrical response (millisecond) directly to the picosecond dynamics of the laser excitation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%