2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2013.10.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electricians’ chrysotile asbestos exposure from electrical products and risks of mesothelioma and lung cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
2
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the levels of such exposure are not expected to exceed the current occupational exposure limits for asbestos of 0.1 f/ml as an 8-hr TWA or 1.0 f/ml averaged over a 30-minute exposure period. This exposure analysis is consistent with a recent assessment of cancer risk among electricians that concluded exposure to chrysotile in electrical products is well below the OSHA permissible exposure limit and does not increase the risk of lung cancer and mesothelioma (7). In addition, this investigation demonstrates the importance of TEM adjustment of PCM findings to accurately characterize asbestos and non-asbestos form fibers in the work environment.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…However, the levels of such exposure are not expected to exceed the current occupational exposure limits for asbestos of 0.1 f/ml as an 8-hr TWA or 1.0 f/ml averaged over a 30-minute exposure period. This exposure analysis is consistent with a recent assessment of cancer risk among electricians that concluded exposure to chrysotile in electrical products is well below the OSHA permissible exposure limit and does not increase the risk of lung cancer and mesothelioma (7). In addition, this investigation demonstrates the importance of TEM adjustment of PCM findings to accurately characterize asbestos and non-asbestos form fibers in the work environment.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…[8] [9][10]. This supposition is consistent with the lack of epidemiological evidence for enhanced asbestos-related disease among multiple occupational cohorts[9] [11][12].…”
supporting
confidence: 65%
“…Some studies have shown that there is no detectable health risk of chrysotile asbestos exposed to low doses (Bernstein, et al,2013). There are also reports showing that even high-dose chrysotile exposure has only a low risk (Goodman, et al,2014). The preliminary results of this research group showed that low-dose chrysotile asbestos exposure can induce malignant transformation of MeT-5A cells and obtain the biological characteristics of mesothelioma cells.…”
Section: Disscussionmentioning
confidence: 75%