2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2015.05.063
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electricity futures price models: Calibration and forecasting

Abstract: A new one factor model with a random volatility parameter is presented in this paper for pricing of electricity futures contracts. It is shown that the model is more tractable than multi-factor jump diffusion models and yields an approximate closed-form pricing formula for the electricity futures prices. On real market data, it is shown that the performance of the new model compares favorably with two existing models in the literature, viz. a two factor jump diffusion model and its jump free version, i.e., a t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, we feel it is not necessary to include a jump component in the multifactor models in modeling electricity futures. Moreover, our results are consistent with the finding in Islyaev and Date (2015) that modeling jumps does not lead to a better price prediction in electricity markets.…”
Section: Estimation Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Thus, we feel it is not necessary to include a jump component in the multifactor models in modeling electricity futures. Moreover, our results are consistent with the finding in Islyaev and Date (2015) that modeling jumps does not lead to a better price prediction in electricity markets.…”
Section: Estimation Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…To see if adding an additional jump component would improve the performance of the model for the electricity futures, we follow the works in Villaplana (2003) and Islyaev and Date (2015). We consider a model with a jump component, in which all else is the same as in Model 2 except that Equation (3.2) is as follows: dzt=κztdt+σzdwzt+dJt,where Jt is a Compound Poisson process which has intensity λ and jump sizes Y=false{Y1,,Ytfalse} Nfalse(μJ,σJ2false).…”
Section: Estimation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Their results provide an important input into the debate on whether retaining the flexibility to update emission targets is beneficial despite its negative effect of causing policy uncertainty. Similarly, Drake et al (2016) show that emissions price uncertainty under cap-andtrade policy results in greater expected profit than achieved under emissions tax policy with constant emissions price, which contradicts the conventional (2002), Lucia and Schwartz (2002), Fleten and Lemming (2003), Longstaff and Wang (2004), Bunn (2004), Carmona and Coulon (2014), Islyaev and Date (2015), and Caldana et al (2017) Pricing of electricity contracts and derivatives Kwon et al (2006), Thompson (2013), Islyaev and Date (2015), and Wu and Babich (2012) Electricity trading through forward and spot markets Sen et al (2006), Kwon et al (2006), Dong and Liu (2007) Sioshansi (2002), Eydeland and Wolyniec (2003), Deng and Oren (2006), and Liu et al (2006) Open research questions…”
Section: Climate Policy and Its Effect On The Electric Power Industrymentioning
confidence: 92%
“…For this reason, electricity futures trading is more extensive than spot trading. There are also many studies concerning the electricity futures market (e.g., [5][6][7][8]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%