“…Such global lightning detection data was used during the response to the eruption of the remote, and under-instrumented Bogoslof volcano in Alaska (Coombs et al, 2018), where lightning was detected from only roughly half of the ash-producing eruptions. Van Eaton et al (2020) showed that secondary ice-charging processes (Arason et al, 2011;Behnke et al, 2013;Van Eaton et al, 2016;Woodhouse & Behnke, 2014), rather than ash-charging processes (e.g., Houghton et al, 2013;James et al, 2000;Mendez Harper & Dufek, 2016;Mendez Harper et al, 2020;Stern et al, 2019), were likely responsible for the lightning detected by the global networks, and speculated that it was very likely that there was much more lightning and electrical activity that occurred that wasn't detected by the long-range VLF sensors. During this eruption, the global lightning data was a boon for the volcano response effort, though the latency between eruption and first lightning detection varied from one minute to one hour.…”