2018 Aviation Technology, Integration, and Operations Conference 2018
DOI: 10.2514/6.2018-4227
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electrified Aircraft Trade-Space Exploration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several such metrics exist for conventional aircraft, such as the payload-range efficiency (PRE = W PL R/W f ) [31], or the payload-fuel energy efficiency (PFEE = W PL R/E f ) [32]. Alternative metrics have also been used for hybrid-electric aircraft, such as the energy-specific air range (ESAR = dR/dE) [33], the cost-specific air range (COSAR) [26], or the productivity-specific energy consumption (PSEC = E/(m PL R)) [34], where the energy consumed E includes both fuel and battery energy. However, when quantifying the overall "efficiency" of the aircraft in terms of energy consumption, only the energy consumed during the nominal mission must be considered, and not the reserves.…”
Section: Figures Of Meritmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several such metrics exist for conventional aircraft, such as the payload-range efficiency (PRE = W PL R/W f ) [31], or the payload-fuel energy efficiency (PFEE = W PL R/E f ) [32]. Alternative metrics have also been used for hybrid-electric aircraft, such as the energy-specific air range (ESAR = dR/dE) [33], the cost-specific air range (COSAR) [26], or the productivity-specific energy consumption (PSEC = E/(m PL R)) [34], where the energy consumed E includes both fuel and battery energy. However, when quantifying the overall "efficiency" of the aircraft in terms of energy consumption, only the energy consumed during the nominal mission must be considered, and not the reserves.…”
Section: Figures Of Meritmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The component build-up was then modified to account for the weights of the electrical components and to remove the conventional engine and fuel system. The assumptions with respect to the electrical components were varied based on three sets of technologies (current technology, conservative future, optimistic future) as generated from Freidrich and Robertson [22] and Kruger et al [23] and as shown in Table 1. Initial estimates are made for the battery, motor, and inverter weights based on the results of the first iterative process and technology assumptions.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For simplicity in assessing initial results, this current work only models fully-electric configurations, where all vehicle power is stored in batteries. Hybrid-electric powertrains o er substantial range benefits over all-electric configurations [14], at the cost of increased complexity, local emissions, and noise. This range benefit would be expected to apply to both STOL and VTOL configurations; propulsion system architecture is another part of the design space over which the configurations should be compared.…”
Section: Design Mission Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%