1979
DOI: 10.1016/0017-9310(79)90099-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electro-chemical measurements of mass transfer in semi-cylindrical hollows

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

1981
1981
2000
2000

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The present finding that the mass transfer coefficient inside the cavity is less than the flat surface mass transfer coefficient is consistent with the finding of Aggarwal and Talbot [8] who used large semi-cylindrical cavities. They found that local Sh at the wall of the channel in laminar steady flow was reduced by about 25% due to the presence of the semi-cylindrical hollow irrespective of the hollow diameter.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 94%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The present finding that the mass transfer coefficient inside the cavity is less than the flat surface mass transfer coefficient is consistent with the finding of Aggarwal and Talbot [8] who used large semi-cylindrical cavities. They found that local Sh at the wall of the channel in laminar steady flow was reduced by about 25% due to the presence of the semi-cylindrical hollow irrespective of the hollow diameter.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 94%
“…These plots show that the mass transfer data of the cavities fall below the flat surface data; the deeper the cavity, the higher the deviation from the flat plate value. The low mass transfer coefficient inside the cavity compared to that of the flat plate is attributed to the formation of a slow recirculating eddy (secondary flow) inside the cavity under forced convection [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15]. This eddy prevents effective communication between the external flow and the inside of the cavity; the deeper the cavity the larger the diameter of the slow recirculating eddy and the larger the resistance to the rate of mass transfer between the cavity wall and the fluid outside the cavity.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A similar finding was reported by previous studies on different cavity geometry. Aggarwal and Talbot[6] who used semicylindrical cavities reported 25 To decrease in the rate of mass transfer below the flat surface value, while Zaki et al 1151 who used hemispherical cavities reported 52% decrease below the flat surface value. The difference in the percent reduction in the mass transfer coefficient below the flat surface value reported by different authors underlines the importance of cavity geometry in determining the rate of mass transfer inside the cavity.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…and ⌽* ϭ 0 [23] on the top boundary. Condition 23 corresponds to the situation where it was assumed that the top of the calculation domain was an equipotential line, a choice justified by refining the placement of the top boundary until the results were not affected.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%