2012
DOI: 10.1111/vco.12006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electro‐gene‐transfer as a new tool for cancer immunotherapy in animals

Abstract: The concept of vaccines based on the direct inoculation of plasmid DNA gained initial proof-of-concept in small rodent species. Further development was hampered by the difficulty to confirm immunogenicity and efficacy in large animal species and, most importantly, in human clinical trials. These negative findings led to the search of complementary technologies which, in combination with intradermal or intramuscular plasmid DNA injection would result in more robust delivery, decreased interindividual variabilit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Classic vaccination with recombinant antigens or peptides as monotherapy gives little clinical benefit [ 1 , 7 ]. Genetic vaccines show better clinical efficacy [ 8 , 9 ], also in veterinary [ 10 , 11 ] and translational oncology [ 12 ]. Potency of DNA immunization was demonstrated in a variety of clinical applications [ 13 , 14 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Classic vaccination with recombinant antigens or peptides as monotherapy gives little clinical benefit [ 1 , 7 ]. Genetic vaccines show better clinical efficacy [ 8 , 9 ], also in veterinary [ 10 , 11 ] and translational oncology [ 12 ]. Potency of DNA immunization was demonstrated in a variety of clinical applications [ 13 , 14 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As CSPG4 is a self‐antigen with poor or no immunogenicity in autologous hosts, in this study we used a plasmid coding for the hCSPG4, that is characterized by 82% homology and 88% similarity in its amino‐acid sequence when compared with its canine counterpart (cCSPG4), in order to break immune tolerance. The addition of electroporation to DNA vaccine delivery (electrovaccination) further increases the vaccine immunogenicity and its therapeutic efficacy, and prolongs the duration of the immune response …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Electrovaccination combines the advantages of DNA vaccination and electroporation. Specifically, the former is easy to handle, applicable to a broad population, safe, and induces both cellular and humoral immune responses, whereas the latter enhances the expression of the protein encoded by the immunizing DNA and prolongs the duration of the immune response (28,29).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%