1983
DOI: 10.1016/s0006-3495(83)84317-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electro-optical measurements on aqueous suspension of purple membrane from Halobacterium halobium

Abstract: The permanent dipole moment, polarizability, and the retinal angle of Halobacterium halobium purple membranes were determined at different pH values. All of the parameters have a maximum between pH 5 and 6. There is a reversal in the direction of the permanent dipole moment near pH 5. The value of permanent dipole moment was determined to be 60 D/protein at pH 6.6, and the value obtained for polarizability was 3 X 10(-28) Fm2/membrane fragment. The retinal angle of all-trans retinal was 0.8 degrees smaller tha… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
50
2

Year Published

1985
1985
1999
1999

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
3
50
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This fact gave us the chance to derive a characteristic magnetic susceptibility value of pm, determined from the initial slope of the curve according to (1): ZI -Z2 = 7.41 x 10 -`,2 J/T 2. When calculating with the average membrane size, this susceptibility corresponds to an average molar value (per tool bR) of 1.68 x 10-: J/ (mol×T2), which reasonably supports previous results (1.2 x 10 -2 J/(mol x T2)) [8], taking into account the effect of membrane size distribution [6].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This fact gave us the chance to derive a characteristic magnetic susceptibility value of pm, determined from the initial slope of the curve according to (1): ZI -Z2 = 7.41 x 10 -`,2 J/T 2. When calculating with the average membrane size, this susceptibility corresponds to an average molar value (per tool bR) of 1.68 x 10-: J/ (mol×T2), which reasonably supports previous results (1.2 x 10 -2 J/(mol x T2)) [8], taking into account the effect of membrane size distribution [6].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The gel technique has the advantage that the resulting preparations are very stable, the medium can be changed repeatedly, and simultaneous electrical and optical measurements are easily accomplished [5]. The sustained application of an electric field necessary during polymerization, however, decreases orientation of pm because of electrophoretic disordering effects [6]. The poor orientation becomes a serious problem, when photoelectric signals of bR must be measured under extreme conditions, such as very high ionic strengths.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(The outer side has more space for charges and counterions.) Moreover, it is well-known that charge distribution asymmetry depends on pH and changes its sign around pH 5 [14]. Taking into account that the direction of proton pumping does not change with pH [14][15][16], the resulting asymmetry easily explains the pH dependence of the scattering kinetics.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The experiments described here require a suspension of pm with nearly perfect orientation, which cannot be achieved with a dc electric field alone, because in a high electric field two effects counteract orientation: (i) perturbation by an induced dipole moment, perpendicular to the permanent dipole moment and (ii) migration and a resulting shear of the membrane fragments because of the net electric charge of pm (12,21). A high magnetic field will align the membranes perfectly, but because the alignment is caused by an induced magnetic dipole, it cannot orient them facing in the same direction.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%