2004
DOI: 10.1021/jf049562i
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electroanalytical Determination and Fractionation of Copper in Wine

Abstract: Eight different bottled wines (six red wines and two white ones) were studied for copper determination and fractionation. For this purpose, copper determination by square wave voltammetry (SWV) and potentiometry (PSA) stripping analysis using Hg electrodes (drop and film, respectively) were carried out. Two direct procedures for the determination of total copper in wine are proposed; in both cases, drastic treatment of samples is not necessary, the procedures are very fast (estimated time to carry out an analy… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
11
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This is in agreement with the knowledge that sensitivity is higher for SWASV than DPASV and for MFE than HMDE [61,62,64,[106][107][108][109][110][111]. Compared with other techniques applied to wine analysis, it can be noted that the current method has a LOD two times lower than the SWASV method reported in the literature for the determination of Cu using a static mercury drop electrode [60], 20-30 times lower than DPASV [23], 10-300 times lower than AAS [23], and very similar to the LOD of the ICP-MS [37,112].…”
Section: Blanks Detection Limits Accuracy Precisionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…This is in agreement with the knowledge that sensitivity is higher for SWASV than DPASV and for MFE than HMDE [61,62,64,[106][107][108][109][110][111]. Compared with other techniques applied to wine analysis, it can be noted that the current method has a LOD two times lower than the SWASV method reported in the literature for the determination of Cu using a static mercury drop electrode [60], 20-30 times lower than DPASV [23], 10-300 times lower than AAS [23], and very similar to the LOD of the ICP-MS [37,112].…”
Section: Blanks Detection Limits Accuracy Precisionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Considering the wine matrix our sensitivities are considerably higher than both that reported for Cu using SWASV with a static mercury drop electrode, i.e. 3.4 nA nmol −1 L min −1 [60], and those obtained using DPASV with a hanging mercury drop electrode, i.e. 1.0-1.5 (Cd, Pb) and 0.5-0.8 (Cu) nA nmol −1 L min −1 [53].…”
Section: Lineariy Of Peak Current Vs Concentrationcontrasting
confidence: 60%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The six samples 001-006 showed relatively high concentrations of copper (0.46(1)-0.93(2) mg/L), whereas samples 007-011 showed limited values (0.14(4)-0.36(4) mg/L). Wide ranges for copper concentration in wines have been previously found and reported by others including: 0.056-0.764 mg/L (color and region undefined; Schiavo et al, 2008); 0.031-0.313 mg/L red Hungarian wines (Ajtony et al, 2008); 0.5-1.0 Italian Marsala dessert wines (Dugo et al, 2005); 0.2-0.6 mg/L Cretan wines (color undefined; Galani-Nikolakaki et al, 2002); 0.076-0.114 mg/L red wines (region undefined; Sá nchez Misiego et al, 2004); 0.347-0.487 mg/L red Italians wines (from Umbria, Campania and Piemonte regions; Buldini et al, 1999). The comparative analysis suggests that, for the samples 001-006, copper was in some way added (to vines or/and to wines).…”
Section: Coppermentioning
confidence: 85%