2011
DOI: 10.1002/elan.201100461
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electroanalytical Studies on Cobalt(II) Ion‐Selective Sensor of Polymeric Membrane Electrode and Coated Graphite Electrode Based on N2O2 Salen Ligands

Abstract: Poly(vinyl chloride)-based membranes of salen ligands, 2-((E)-((1R,2S)-2-((E)-5-tert-butyl-2-hydroxybenzylideneamino)cyclohexylimino)methyl)-4-tert-butyl phenol (S 1 ) and 2-((E)-((1R,2S)-2-((E)-3,5-di-tert-butyl-2-hydroxybenzylideneamino)cyclohexylimino)methyl)-4,6-di-tert-butylphenol (S 2 ) were fabricated and explored as cobalt(II) selective electrodes. The performance of the polymeric membrane electrode (PME) and coated graphite electrode (CGE) were compared and it was observed that CGE showed a wide worki… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The dynamic response time of the electrodes was evaluated by measuring the average time required to reach a potential within ±1 mV of the final equilibrium potential value after successive immersion of the electrode in a series of uranyl solutions each having a 10‐fold concentration difference and the results are given in Figure . It was found that the propsed sensor quickly reached its equilibrium potential values in the whole concentration (1.0×10 −7 −1.0×10 −1 mol L −1 ) within 20 s. The low response time is probably due to the fast exchange kinetics of the complexation‐decomplexation of UO 2 2+ with the ionophore at the solution‐membrane interface .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dynamic response time of the electrodes was evaluated by measuring the average time required to reach a potential within ±1 mV of the final equilibrium potential value after successive immersion of the electrode in a series of uranyl solutions each having a 10‐fold concentration difference and the results are given in Figure . It was found that the propsed sensor quickly reached its equilibrium potential values in the whole concentration (1.0×10 −7 −1.0×10 −1 mol L −1 ) within 20 s. The low response time is probably due to the fast exchange kinetics of the complexation‐decomplexation of UO 2 2+ with the ionophore at the solution‐membrane interface .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 2-Salen ligands were used as cobalt-selective electrodes, and polymeric membrane electrode (PME) and coated graphite electrode (CGE) were compared, and it was observed that the CGE showed a limit detection of 7 nM. It was used successfully for the detection of cobalt in soil, beer, and water [137]. A bridge-modified 4-tertbutylthiacalix arene was used as an electroactive material for the preparation of a cobalt-selective sensor.…”
Section: Metals Ionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However such materials are not available in abundance, which has made the development of ISE a slightly difficult job. Nevertheless in recent years some new groups of compounds such as Schiff bases [27][28][29], porphyrins [30,31], calixaranes [32,33], macrocyclic compounds [34,35] and other group of compounds [36,37] have been developed which have a coordinating cavity and due to which they tend to show high affinity for some particular metals and poor for others. Among these groups, Schiff bases are the item of choice, because it is easy to form them with varying cavity size.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%