1970
DOI: 10.1007/bf00316137
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electroanatomy of the corpus callosum radiation according to the facts of stereotactic stimulation in man

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

2
1
0

Year Published

1973
1973
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
2
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, temporal and parietal lobe areas as well as posterior corpus callosum were involved. The predominant contribution of anterior corpus callosum to frontal and posterior corpus callosum to temporo-parietal coherence agrees with an anterior-posterior topology of fiber systems passing through the corpus callosum as suggested by a wide range of animal and human studies [De Lacoste et al, 1985;Pandya and Seltzer, 1986;Schaltenbrand et al, 1970]. The contribution of fiber tract integrity in subcortical centers such as thalamus and cerebellum was less pronounced for frontal coherence than for temporo-parietal coherence.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 54%
“…Additionally, temporal and parietal lobe areas as well as posterior corpus callosum were involved. The predominant contribution of anterior corpus callosum to frontal and posterior corpus callosum to temporo-parietal coherence agrees with an anterior-posterior topology of fiber systems passing through the corpus callosum as suggested by a wide range of animal and human studies [De Lacoste et al, 1985;Pandya and Seltzer, 1986;Schaltenbrand et al, 1970]. The contribution of fiber tract integrity in subcortical centers such as thalamus and cerebellum was less pronounced for frontal coherence than for temporo-parietal coherence.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 54%
“…In our stereotactic laboratory, we followed the indications which had been proposed by Spiegel and Wycis [1950], Orchinik et al [1950], Spiegel et al [1964], Riechert [1957], by Hassler and by Narabayashi for the treatment of intractable pain, parkin sonism, extrapyramidal hyperkinesias, compulsion disorders, erethism and pituitary disorders. The results were partially published by Schaltenbrand [1966] and Schaltenbrand et al [1965Schaltenbrand et al [ , 1970Schaltenbrand et al [ , 1971Schaltenbrand et al [ , 1973Schaltenbrand et al [ , 1974 and by Kleinfelder et al [1964] and N adjmi and Borner [1968].…”
supporting
confidence: 62%
“…Electrical stimulation of the CC established the motor function and topographic representation of the body of the CC in the monkey long before anatomy: “When the electrodes are applied over and just behind the genu, head and eye movements are produced; further back movements of the arms and shoulder and of the upper part of the trunk; then movements of the forearms and general movements of the hands and fingers; then of the lower part of the trunk and tail, and lastly, movements of the lower limbs” ( Mott and Schaefer, 1890 ). Schaltenbrand et al (1970) reported the results of CC stimulation in 9 patients. Depending on the stimulated site they obtained movements, paresthesia, as well as interference with speech and thinking.…”
Section: Electrical Magnetic and Optogenetic Stimulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%