2014
DOI: 10.1111/bjd.12906
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electrobrasion vs. manual dermabrasion: a randomized, double-blind, comparative effectiveness trial

Abstract: Both dermabrasion and electrobrasion improved scars, but there was no significant difference between the outcomes of the two procedures on several measures. Procedure time and bleeding time were significantly lower for electrobrasion.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The epidermis is abraded to a variable extent; however, this certainly carries the risk of bleeding as well as acquiring infections. Refined techniques including CO 2 laser resurfacing as well as electrobrasion have become more renowned and carry less risks [25]. These can help eliminate scars post transplantation as well as remove abnormal pigmentation of the CTA giving enhanced skin texture and appearance.…”
Section: Revision Surgeriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The epidermis is abraded to a variable extent; however, this certainly carries the risk of bleeding as well as acquiring infections. Refined techniques including CO 2 laser resurfacing as well as electrobrasion have become more renowned and carry less risks [25]. These can help eliminate scars post transplantation as well as remove abnormal pigmentation of the CTA giving enhanced skin texture and appearance.…”
Section: Revision Surgeriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Viewing an altered facial structure can induce emotional stress as an individual fails to recognize his/her own identity [28]. However, until now there has been no documented psychological complications due to altered identity with recipients having had accepted their new appearance [5,19,25]. Recipients have also been shown to not possess donor resemblance [29,30] as was initially predicted by Butler [16], thus nullifying these perceived risks.…”
Section: Psychological Risksmentioning
confidence: 99%