2016 IEEE 5th Global Conference on Consumer Electronics 2016
DOI: 10.1109/gcce.2016.7800547
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electrocardiogram diagnosis using wavelet-based artificial neural network

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the preceding studies, quantifying respiratory data is generally limited to analyzing the pronounced features of the signal such as inhales, exhales, and breathing rate-discarding the many other features present in these waveforms. Relative to the electrocardiogram (EKG), where research has precisely defined each component of the waveform (Ponikowski et al 2016), established standard methods to detect them (Addison 2005), and used this information to predict cardiovascular disease (Václavík et al 2014;Chen et al 2016), the tools and methodology available for interpreting respiratory signals have been relatively limited. Several manuscripts mention a need for more sophisticated respiratory signal processing methods to advance our understanding of respiration and its clinical applications (Boiten et al 1994;Folke et al 2003;Van Duinen et al 2010;Vlemincx et al 2011;Meredith et al 2012;Grassmann et al 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the preceding studies, quantifying respiratory data is generally limited to analyzing the pronounced features of the signal such as inhales, exhales, and breathing rate-discarding the many other features present in these waveforms. Relative to the electrocardiogram (EKG), where research has precisely defined each component of the waveform (Ponikowski et al 2016), established standard methods to detect them (Addison 2005), and used this information to predict cardiovascular disease (Václavík et al 2014;Chen et al 2016), the tools and methodology available for interpreting respiratory signals have been relatively limited. Several manuscripts mention a need for more sophisticated respiratory signal processing methods to advance our understanding of respiration and its clinical applications (Boiten et al 1994;Folke et al 2003;Van Duinen et al 2010;Vlemincx et al 2011;Meredith et al 2012;Grassmann et al 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…LSTM neural networks [83] Add fault identification methods. ART neural networks [84] It enhanced signal extraction capabilities. BAM neural networks [85] Remove redundant failure data.…”
Section: Table ⅲ Ait Diagnostic Methods Statistics Diagnostic Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…I A PVA fault diagnosis model based on an LSTM neural network is proposed in [83], which studies the influence of different fault states on the output characteristics of PVS through simulation and then obtains fault characteristic parameters. Reference [84] develops a PV fault diagnosis method based on an improved adaptive resonance theory (ART) neural network, which characterizes different fault characteristics using a matrix, allowing for the accurate diagnosis of PVS faults. In addition, reference [85] investigates a fault diagnosis method that integrates the theory of the fault tree (FT) and bidirectional associative memory (BAM) neural network.…”
Section: ) Neural Network Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The result illustrated that the W-ANN can provide lower computing time such that reduction time was 49% and cleaner ECG input signal. The method was implemented on the data MIT-BIH arrhythmia database and real ECG signal measurement [39]. Boussaa et al (2016) presented the design of a cardiac pathologies detection system with high precision of calculation and decision, which consists of the mel-frequency coefficient cepstrum algorithms such as fingerprint extractor (or features) of the cardiac signal and the algorithms of ANN multilayer perceptron (MLP) type MLP classifier as fingerprints extracted into two classes: Normal or abnormal.…”
Section: Annmentioning
confidence: 99%