1991
DOI: 10.1016/0002-8703(91)90530-u
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electrocardiographic diagnosis of left ventricular hypertrophy in the presence of bundle branch block

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…15 More recent studies using echocardiography as the gold standard for LVH also have demonstrated reduced sensitivity of ECG voltage criteria in the presence of RBBB. 4,[6][7][8] Our findings quantify the reduction in leftward and posterior mid-QRS amplitudes during RBBB that explain these observations. In our population, both Sokolow-Lyon and Cornell voltage combinations were greatly reduced (5-7 mm, 500-700 μV) in the presence of RBBB.…”
Section: Effect Of Rbbb On Voltage Criteria Used For the Detection Ofsupporting
confidence: 52%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…15 More recent studies using echocardiography as the gold standard for LVH also have demonstrated reduced sensitivity of ECG voltage criteria in the presence of RBBB. 4,[6][7][8] Our findings quantify the reduction in leftward and posterior mid-QRS amplitudes during RBBB that explain these observations. In our population, both Sokolow-Lyon and Cornell voltage combinations were greatly reduced (5-7 mm, 500-700 μV) in the presence of RBBB.…”
Section: Effect Of Rbbb On Voltage Criteria Used For the Detection Ofsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…5 It is generally recognized that RBBB alters ECG amplitudes to reduce the already poor sensitivity of standard voltage criteria for the detection of left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH). [4][5][6][7][8][9] However, the magnitude of QRS voltage changes caused by RBBB in the standard leads of the routine ECG has not been quantified in patients and subjects who are in a temporally and physiologically constant state. The present study examined the effect of RBBB on QRS amplitudes and voltage criteria used for the detection of LVH in a consecutive series of patients with intermittent bundle branch block and normal (i.e., nonRBBB) intraventricular conduction during simultaneous lead recording of a single 10-second ECG.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These results question the usefulness of the LVH electrocardiographic criteria in patient with LBBB. Although some reports have yielded high sensitivity [17][18][19][20][21], especially when using a computer-assisted diagnostic system [6], other groups have also questioned the use of ECG-based LVH criteria in patients with LBBB [7]. Previous studies testing ECG-based LVH criteria in patients with LBBB were performed prior to the development of the stricter LBBB criteria, and likely enrolled a more heterogeneous population, mixing conduction disease with LVH or LV dilation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The highest values (area under curve > 0.8) were noted for parameters that included S wave amplitude: S in V2, V3 i.e. RaVL+SV3, SV2+SV3, autopsy or echocardiographic study [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14]. The most frequently cited ECG criterion for LVH in patients with LBBB (S in V2+RV6 > 45 mm) was reported with maximal 86% sensitivity and 100% specificity [15].…”
Section: Predictive Value Of Ecg For Lvh In Lbbbmentioning
confidence: 99%