2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jelechem.2022.116464
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electrocatalytic activity of pristine and electrochemically activated SnSe2 nanoplates for the hydrogen evolution reaction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The stability of AuCu/CN-1% was evaluated at 785 mV vs RHE for a 12 h time scale by a chronoamperometry curve, which exhibited a rapid increase of current density in electrochemical hydrogen production, which confirmed that the catalyst was activated after continuous LSV scans, shown in Figure S4g. 43,44 These were demonstrated in that the H 2 production process was relatively easy for AuCu/ CN-1%. 45 Photoluminescence (PL) spectra of samples were collected, as shown in Figure 5d.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The stability of AuCu/CN-1% was evaluated at 785 mV vs RHE for a 12 h time scale by a chronoamperometry curve, which exhibited a rapid increase of current density in electrochemical hydrogen production, which confirmed that the catalyst was activated after continuous LSV scans, shown in Figure S4g. 43,44 These were demonstrated in that the H 2 production process was relatively easy for AuCu/ CN-1%. 45 Photoluminescence (PL) spectra of samples were collected, as shown in Figure 5d.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…We find two optimal configurations, i.e., the upright triangle (UT-Cu 3 @MoSX) and flat triangle (FT-Cu 3 @MoSX) configurations. The substrate polarization is shown to reduce the absolute value of the limiting potentials (| U L |) of the overall CO 2 RR compared to the unpolarized Cu 3 @MoS 2 substrate and boosts the CO 2 RR activity. The | U L | for Cu 3 (S)@MoSX is lower than that of Cu 3 (X)@MoSX, suggesting that the CO 2 RR performance strongly depends on the substrate polarization direction and strength.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%