topology, and pore structure. This has led to research via various chemical approaches to control precisely chemical moieties within the structure of MOFs. [3] However, the direct (bottom-up) synthesis of MOFs from metal ions and ligands is not always feasible due to factors, including limited reactant concentration, lack of solvent, improper reaction temperature, and undesired side reactions. [4] Therefore, postsynthesis (top-down) methods are receiving increased research attention. This approach is seen as being flexible to modulate the structure of assynthesized MOFs. [5] For example, the synthesis of defects via missing clusters can regulate the pore volume of derived MOFs to boost CO 2 capture from flue gas. [6] Additionally, missing linkers not only create vacancy sites in MOF-808 (Zr 6 O 5 (OH) 3 (BTC) 2 (HCOO) 5 (H 2 O) 2 , BTC = 1,3,5-benzenetricarboxylate) and UiO-66 (University in Oslo, Zr 6 O 4 (OH) 4 (BDC) 6 , BDC = terephthalic acid) but introduce OH groups, which work as Brønsted bases to facilitate tertbutyl alcohol catalytic dehydration. [7] Weakening of the energy of metal-linker coordination bonds provides an opportunity to achieve postsynthesis of MOFs. [8] Using simple thermal pyrolysis, derivatives such as transitionmetal-based materials, single-atom catalysts, and carbon materials have been prepared for catalysis and energy-related applications. [9] However, the structure of MOFs is destroyed during many of these treatments. As a result, MOFs serve only as precursors for the derivatives rather than the direct active materials in catalytic application. [] Here, we focus on postsynthesis methods involving selective chemical bond cleavage to tailor composites and create new MOF structures. This method is advantageous because the reticular chemistry structure of the parent is not destroyed.Posttreatment of MOFs can be conveniently categorized as one of each of three distinct methods: 1) introduction of foreign metal ions or ligands into a pristine structure via exchange reactions; [4] 2) solvent-assisted incorporation of linkers on vacant/labile sites into the structure; [11] and 3) partial destruction to a new structure. [12] Generally, for the first two, the insertion of linkers with desired functional groups is not always trivial because these groups coordinate to metal sites during synthesis, losing functionalities. [13] The destruction of MOFs by cleavage of coordination bonds between metal and solvent molecules/linkers to precisely tune structures generates opening of metal sites, defects, hierarchical pores, orThe physicochemical properties of metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) significantly depend on composition, topology, and porosity, which can be tuned via synthesis. In addition to a classic direct synthesis, postsynthesis modulations of MOFs, including ion exchange, installation, and destruction, can significantly expand the application. Because of a limitation of the qualitative hard and soft acids and bases (HSAB) theory, posttreatment permits regulation of MOF structure by cleavi...