1987
DOI: 10.5006/1.3583121
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electrochemical and Microstructural Investigation of Grain Boundary Precipitation in AISI 304 Stainless Steels Containing Nitrogen

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0
1

Year Published

1996
1996
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
23
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Because the element N was not the stabilizer of ferrite, the numerous undissolved N element are provided from the ferrite [18]. In addition, the element N possesses better affinity to Cr than the element C [19], wherefore the elements N and Cr easily react with each other and precipitate to form Cr 2 N. Due to the formation of Cr 2 N at the δ/γ grain boundaries, Cr concentration in ferrite was decreased by diffusing toward δ/γ grain boundary to induce ferrite transform to γ 2 phase. Furthermore, the γ 2 -phase continuous growth process needed austenitic stabilizers (Ni, Cu and Mn) to supply reaction of δ→γ 2 .…”
Section: Phase Transformation Steps Under Aging Treatment At 800℃mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because the element N was not the stabilizer of ferrite, the numerous undissolved N element are provided from the ferrite [18]. In addition, the element N possesses better affinity to Cr than the element C [19], wherefore the elements N and Cr easily react with each other and precipitate to form Cr 2 N. Due to the formation of Cr 2 N at the δ/γ grain boundaries, Cr concentration in ferrite was decreased by diffusing toward δ/γ grain boundary to induce ferrite transform to γ 2 phase. Furthermore, the γ 2 -phase continuous growth process needed austenitic stabilizers (Ni, Cu and Mn) to supply reaction of δ→γ 2 .…”
Section: Phase Transformation Steps Under Aging Treatment At 800℃mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Controversial opinions exist among various authors on the threshold nitrogen % up to which the beneficial effect with respect to sensitization is observed [15][16][17][18][19]. In other words, in austenitic stainless steels, the effect of nitrogen on the sensitization process is not clearly understood.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Presence of nitrogen in austenitic SS has been reported to affect the IGSCC susceptibility to a large extent. Mozhi et al [29,61,62] have reported that presence of nitrogen to the extent of 0.16 wt.% in austenitic type 304 stainless steels increases the SCC resistance and reduces it when nitrogen level increases further. Nitrogen addition in austenitic type 304 stainless steels retards the sensitisation kinetics as for a constant carbon level, the grain boundary chromium concentration in equilibrium with the carbide increases with increasing nitrogen content.…”
Section: Effect Of Nitrogen In Stainless Steelmentioning
confidence: 97%