The effect of anodization temperature and tartaric acid concentration on the morphology and corrosion resistance of the anodic film formed on AA2099-T8 alloy in tartaric-sulfuric acid was investigated. It was found that the dissolution of the anodic film during anodizing led to increased pore size, rod-shaped cavities and grain boundary grooves in the anodic films. The rod-shaped cavities and grain boundary grooves are associated with selective dissolution of the anodic film formed from fine T 1 (Al 2 CuLi) phase precipitates due to the difference in the reactivity of the films formed from different phases. The increased porosity due to dissolution degraded the corrosion resistance of the anodic film. In the temperature range of 22-47 • C, with 0.53 M tartaric acid addition, anodizing at 42 • C provided the best corrosion performance and a relatively high anodizing efficiency; in the tartaric acid concentration range of 0-0.9 M, at 37 • C, anodizing in electrolytes containing 0.7 and 0.9 M tartaric acid provided good corrosion resistance with little decrease of anodizing efficiency. The corrosive medium did not penetrate the anodic film uniformly but preferentially at local sites, resulting in localized corrosion of the anodized alloy. Aluminum and its alloys are protected from corrosion by an airformed oxide film of several nanometers thickness. However, the protective ability of the air-formed oxide film is limited due to its small thickness. In order to obtain more reliable and durable protection for aluminum and its alloys, a relatively thick oxide film has been pursued. As a case in point, aerospace aluminum alloys are anodized in acidic electrolyte to produce a relatively thick anodic oxide film of a few micrometers, providing the alloys with reasonable corrosion resistance and/or suitable surface for painting and adhesive bonding. Chromic acid anodizing (CAA) used to be the most widely employed anodizing process in aerospace industry.1-3 However, the high toxicity associated with Cr (VI) has restricted the application of CAA. Since 1990s, there have been many efforts to find alternative anodizing process to replace CAA in aerospace industry. [4][5][6] Sulfuric acid anodizing (SAA) is a commonly used, environmentally friendly anodizing process. However, a relatively thicker anodic film is needed for SAA than for CAA if the same corrosion resistance is required.
3On the other hand, increased film thickness will sacrifice fatigue resistance of the anodized components, 3,7-9 not mentioning cost increase. In 1990, Wong et al.3 invented a boric-sulfuric acid anodizing (BSA) process, which modifies the traditional SAA process by reducing the concentration of sulfuric acid and adding boric acid. It is now recognized that the performance of the anodic film produced by BSA is similar to that of the anodic film produced by CAA. 5,10 At the begin of the twenty first century, a new anodizing process, called tartaricsulfuric acid anodizing (TSA), was patented by Alenia Aeronautica S.P.A.11 to compete with BSA. Since th...