2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2021.138642
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electrochemical biosensor for the detection of a sequence of the TP53 gene using a methylene blue labelled DNA probe

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The detection limit of the electrochemical DNA sensor was up to 10 nM due to the hairpin structure and signal amplification of MB. The obtained detection limit for TP53 is significantly better than that of the field-effect transistor sensor (100 nM) [ 45 ], and is comparable to that of the electrochemical biosensor developed by Otero et al [ 37 ]. With an increase in cDNA concentration, the binding efficiency of the double-stranded was improved, and a larger amount of MB was far away from the electrode surface, resulting in a significant decrease in peak current.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 68%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The detection limit of the electrochemical DNA sensor was up to 10 nM due to the hairpin structure and signal amplification of MB. The obtained detection limit for TP53 is significantly better than that of the field-effect transistor sensor (100 nM) [ 45 ], and is comparable to that of the electrochemical biosensor developed by Otero et al [ 37 ]. With an increase in cDNA concentration, the binding efficiency of the double-stranded was improved, and a larger amount of MB was far away from the electrode surface, resulting in a significant decrease in peak current.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…The DNA surface coverage ( , pmol/cm 2 ) was calculated using Equation (1). where Q (C), n , F , and A eff represent the reduced charge of an electrochemical indicator (MB) in cyclic voltammetry obtained for the ssDNA-Au electrodes, the quantity of electrons involved in the reaction (2e − ), the Faraday constant (96,485 × 10 −12 C/pmol), and the effective area of the Au disk electrode, respectively [ 36 , 37 ]. The DNA surface coverage was determined by integrating the second scan’s reduction peak of cyclic voltammograms.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…15 However, the requirement for a labelling step to transduce the hybridization event, electrode fouling, and the difficulty in distinguishing the electrochemical signal produced by targets with a low concentration from the background signal are the main limitations of an electrochemical genosensor, that can result in inaccurate results. [16][17][18] Therefore, efforts have been made to use a gene-specic bioreceptor for the fabrication of a specic biosensing platform. In this context, the mA gene of E. coli shows enormous potential for the development of a genosensor for NS detection.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of these products are expensive and difficult to synthesize. As a result, redox‐active substances such as methylene blue [ 32 ] and ferrocene [ 33 ] are widely used that can directly obtain signals and are simple, inexpensive, and reversible. However, methylene blue and ferrocene only produce one electron, and two electrons transfer during a redox process, leading to low sensitivity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of these products are expensive and difficult to synthesize. As a result, redox-active substances such as methylene blue [32] and ferrocene [33] are widely used that can directly obtain signals and are simple, inexpensive, and reversible.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%