“…Interestingly, a square wave voltammetry study of Av NifDK, which was immobilized on a pyrene-modified hydrogel film and directly attached to the electrode, led to the assignment of −590 mV vs NHE to the M N /M R redox couple, a potential much more negative than that determined indirectly with redox mediators for the same protein in the presence of its reductase partner, Av NifH . Similarly, it was observed that upon extraction of the M-cluster as an intact entity into an organic solvent (e.g., NMF and DMF), the midpoint potentials of the cofactor became more negative, with values of −320 to −270 mV vs SHE and −1 V vs SHE, respectively, reported for the M OX /M N and M N /M R redox couples. − Moreover, the change in the potential of the extracted cofactor was shown to be accompanied by a broadening of the cofactor-specific S = 3/2 EPR signal ( g = 4.7, 3.5, 2.0) (Figure B). , Apparently, immobilization of NifDK without NifH on an electrode, or extraction of the cofactor from NifDK into solvents, renders the electronic and redox properties of the M-cluster different than those of its counterpart in the complete nitrogenase system. Nevertheless, both the isolated NifDK protein and the extracted M-cluster are capable of C 1 substrate reduction on their own (see section below), highlighting the catalytic versatility of the various components of nitrogenase.…”