2020
DOI: 10.1108/acmm-05-2020-2306
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electrochemical corrosion behavior and surface passivation of bulk nanocrystalline copper in alkaline solution

Abstract: Purpose This paper aims to focus on an assessment of the electrochemical corrosion performance of bulk NC copper in a variety of corrosion environments. Design/methodology/approach The electrochemical corrosion behavior of bulk nanocrystalline (NC) copper prepared by inert gas condensation and in situ warm compress technique was studied by using potentiodynamic polarization and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy tests in de-aerated 0.1 M NaOH solution. Findings NC copper exhibited a typical active-pass… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our findings are in contradiction with current literature, wherein it is often proposed that the catalyst deactivation observed for Cu surfaces is possibly due to changes in the surface morphology resulting in facet redistribution, ,, , as induced in some manner by the reaction environment (e.g., due to the applied potential, ,, or due to (CO2RR intermediate-related) adsorbates, or due to the local pH, , or other factors). However, a comparatively much simpler explanation underlying reported changes in surface morphology exists: accidental surface oxidation and subsequent anisotropic (Figures and ) reduction of the surface (likely in concert with dissolution and redeposition), as also proposed by Popovic et al, where the rate of reduction of these oxides is likely to influence the final morphology.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Our findings are in contradiction with current literature, wherein it is often proposed that the catalyst deactivation observed for Cu surfaces is possibly due to changes in the surface morphology resulting in facet redistribution, ,, , as induced in some manner by the reaction environment (e.g., due to the applied potential, ,, or due to (CO2RR intermediate-related) adsorbates, or due to the local pH, , or other factors). However, a comparatively much simpler explanation underlying reported changes in surface morphology exists: accidental surface oxidation and subsequent anisotropic (Figures and ) reduction of the surface (likely in concert with dissolution and redeposition), as also proposed by Popovic et al, where the rate of reduction of these oxides is likely to influence the final morphology.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the PDP curves, two important parameters can be determined: the corrosion potential ( E corr ) and corrosion current density ( I corr ). Here, the E corr is associated with the stability of the samples and the I corr is important to evaluate the kinetic of corrosion reactions (Wei et al , 2016; Sun et al , 2017; Luo and Hu, 2020). The E corr and I corr have been calculated based on the Tafel extrapolation (Lu et al , 2015), as listed in Table 1.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SSE processed sample at eight passes represented a non-equilibrium grain boundary state, having higher dislocation density than coarse grain material. It may promote the activation energy associated with the dissolution process [21][22][23][24][25]. After twelve passes, the non-equilibrium grain boundaries transformed into equilibrium grain boundaries due to large deformation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%