2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2017.09.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electrochemical Cr(VI) reduction using a sacrificial Fe anode: Impacts of solution chemistry and stoichiometry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The Ministry of Ecology and Environment of the People's Republic of China and World Health Organization (WHO) have regulated the maximum concentration authorized in drinking water as being below 0.05 mg/L (Sanitary Standard for Drinking Water Quality (2001)) [3,4]. However, the inevitable drawbacks of high cost or secondary contamination still exist among conventional methods to remove heavy metals from aqueous solutions, such as chemical reduction [5,6], membrane separation [7], electrolytic [8], ferrite method [9,10], precipitation [11], adsorption [12,13], ion exchange [14] and biological method [15]. Hence, it is important to explore a cost-efficient method for Cr(VI) removal.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Ministry of Ecology and Environment of the People's Republic of China and World Health Organization (WHO) have regulated the maximum concentration authorized in drinking water as being below 0.05 mg/L (Sanitary Standard for Drinking Water Quality (2001)) [3,4]. However, the inevitable drawbacks of high cost or secondary contamination still exist among conventional methods to remove heavy metals from aqueous solutions, such as chemical reduction [5,6], membrane separation [7], electrolytic [8], ferrite method [9,10], precipitation [11], adsorption [12,13], ion exchange [14] and biological method [15]. Hence, it is important to explore a cost-efficient method for Cr(VI) removal.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hexavalent chromium is much more poisonous, soluble, and mobile than Cr­(III), which has led the World Health Organization (WHO) to set the upper limit of Cr­(VI) in drinking water at 0.05 mg/L . In addition, hexavalent chromium has been classed as a Group I human carcinogenic substance by the International Agency for Research Cancer . Therefore, there is an urgent demand for developing highly effective, reliable, and economical techniques to remove Cr­(VI) from contaminated water or reduce Cr­(VI) to Cr­(III) to decrease its toxicity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 In addition, hexavalent chromium has been classed as a Group I human carcinogenic substance by the International Agency for Research Cancer. 3 Therefore, there is an urgent demand for developing highly effective, reliable, and economical techni-ques to remove Cr(VI) from contaminated water or reduce Cr(VI) to Cr(III) to decrease its toxicity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Por ejemplo, el reactor de electrocoagulación de columna optimizado con técnicas estadísticas propuesto por Khan y colaboradores[76] consume 12.9 kW-h‧kg-Cr(VI) −1 , lo que es 2.8 veces el consumo del EAR. Otro ejemplo son los trabajos en la reducción de Cr(VI) reportados por el grupo de investigación de Chi-Wang Li utilizando celdas electroquímicas de electrocoagulación, donde el consumo energético reportado varía de entre 38 a 93 kW-h‧kg-Cr(VI) −1[77,78], los cuales están más de diez veces por encima de los reportados en la Tabla 3.Parámetros de eficiencia hidráulica de los sistemas de agitación.…”
unclassified