2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.12.092
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electrochemical degradation of industrial textile dye disperse yellow 3: Role of electrocatalytic material and experimental conditions on the catalytic production of oxidants and oxidation pathway

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
20
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
20
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In this experiment, as the pH value increases from acidic to alkaline the percentage of color removal decreases, which represents an inversely proportional relationship graph pattern. Those achieved results are similar to previous studies, which indicate high accuracy of this experiment [22]. Those results can be explained as the dye solution is at acidic condition such as pH 3, the electrostatic attraction increases as the adsorbent with positive charge surface interact with negatively charged dye solution.…”
Section: Batch Studiessupporting
confidence: 90%
“…In this experiment, as the pH value increases from acidic to alkaline the percentage of color removal decreases, which represents an inversely proportional relationship graph pattern. Those achieved results are similar to previous studies, which indicate high accuracy of this experiment [22]. Those results can be explained as the dye solution is at acidic condition such as pH 3, the electrostatic attraction increases as the adsorbent with positive charge surface interact with negatively charged dye solution.…”
Section: Batch Studiessupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Electrochemical advanced oxidation processes (EAOPs) as an alternative treatment technique for organic-contaminated wastewater has been extensively developed and studied in the last two decades due to their versatility, environmental compatibility, high energy efficiency and amenability to automation [1][2][3][4]. The oxidative degradation and efficient removal of organic pollutant in EAOPs is achieved by means of in-situ generated hydroxyl radical ( % OH), which is a very reactive nonselective reagent and strong oxidant (second strongest oxidant known after fluorine) [5][6][7][8]. Among EAOPs, anodic oxidation (AO) and electro-Fenton (EF) processes in which % OH are generated either at the surface of the high-oxygen overpotential anode (M) via water oxidation (Eq.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Depending on the nature of the anode, the AO process can oxide organic pollutants dissolved in water in two ways: (i) a direct oxidation at the anode surface promotes partial conversion on oxidized or biodegradable compounds; ii) an indirect oxidation converts pollutants into CO 2 and H 2 O by means of strong oxidant species produced on the anode surface, such as . OH, persulfate and ozone, among others . In the presence of chlorides, the oxidation of organic compounds is mainly caused by the occurrence of active chlorine species like hypochlorous acid and hypochlorite, produced by the following reactions (Equations (2), (3) and (4)):<…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most common DSA‐type anode in wastewater treatment is Ti/Ru 0.3 Ti 0.7 O 2 (DSA‐Cl 2 ) due to its high catalytic activity, high stability to anodic corrosion and mechanical steadiness, as well as high electrocatalytic activity for chlorine evolution as a consequence of the surface redox reactions taking place at transition metal ions that act as active sites for the absorption of chlorine atoms . Several studies have addressed the effects of dye concentration, pH, supporting electrolyte, electrode material and current density on dye removal efficiency, but limited works analyze intermediates, by‐products and dye degradation mechanisms …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%