2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2018.10.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electrochemical detection of monosodium glutamate in foodstuffs based on Au@MoS2/chitosan modified glassy carbon electrode

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
28
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…(UV) spectroscopy (Asfaram, Ghaedi, & Dashtian, 2017), highperformance liquid chromatography (HPLC; Fernandes, Batista, de Medeiros, Santos, & Medeiros, 2015), ultrahigh-performance liquid chromatography−tandem mass spectrometry (Newsome, Li, & van Breemen, 2016), thin layer chromatography (Anandjiwala, Srinivasa, & Rajani, 2007), and electrochemical techniques (Shojaei, Nasirizadeh, Entezam, Koosha, & Azimzadeh, 2016). Among these approaches, electrochemical analysis is one of the most facile methods due to its advantages of low cost, high sensitivity, and efficiency (Baig, & Sajid, 2017), and a variety of modified electrodes have been developed to improve the electrochemical signal response of the analyte (Balasubramanian, Balamurugan, Chen, Chen, & Lin, 2019;Devi et al, 2019). Based on the oxidizable characteristics of GA, voltammetry, including cyclic voltammetry, differential pulse voltammetry, stripping voltammetry, and square wave voltammetry, has been employed in almost all electrochemical measurements of GA (Abbasi, Daneshfar, Hamdghadareh, & Farmany, 2011;Shahamirifard, Ghaedi, Razmi, & Hajati, 2018;Tashkhourian, & Nami-Ana, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(UV) spectroscopy (Asfaram, Ghaedi, & Dashtian, 2017), highperformance liquid chromatography (HPLC; Fernandes, Batista, de Medeiros, Santos, & Medeiros, 2015), ultrahigh-performance liquid chromatography−tandem mass spectrometry (Newsome, Li, & van Breemen, 2016), thin layer chromatography (Anandjiwala, Srinivasa, & Rajani, 2007), and electrochemical techniques (Shojaei, Nasirizadeh, Entezam, Koosha, & Azimzadeh, 2016). Among these approaches, electrochemical analysis is one of the most facile methods due to its advantages of low cost, high sensitivity, and efficiency (Baig, & Sajid, 2017), and a variety of modified electrodes have been developed to improve the electrochemical signal response of the analyte (Balasubramanian, Balamurugan, Chen, Chen, & Lin, 2019;Devi et al, 2019). Based on the oxidizable characteristics of GA, voltammetry, including cyclic voltammetry, differential pulse voltammetry, stripping voltammetry, and square wave voltammetry, has been employed in almost all electrochemical measurements of GA (Abbasi, Daneshfar, Hamdghadareh, & Farmany, 2011;Shahamirifard, Ghaedi, Razmi, & Hajati, 2018;Tashkhourian, & Nami-Ana, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, electrochemical methods and particularly voltammetry, have attracted significant attention due to their benefits like sensitivity, simplicity, low cost, accuracy and selective specification of electroactive species [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28]. In addition, the usage of electrochemical approaches towards detection of FA is generally promising because FA is the electrochemically active compound [29,30].…”
Section: A D V a N C E D O N L I N E A R T I C L Ementioning
confidence: 99%
“…These determinations guarantee the safety, quality and traceability of food, in compliance with legislation and consumers’ demands. In this framework, the use of noble metal nanoparticles was recently suggested as an alternative to classical methods of determination [54]. NPs could improve the analytical accuracy, precision, detection limits, and sample quantity, thereby expanding the practical range of food applications [2].…”
Section: Nutrients and Bioactive Compoundsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An amperometric immunosensor for the detection of monosodium glutamate (MSG) was recently reported by Devi et al In this sensor, the anti-glutamate antibody was immobilized on to the sensor surface, composed of a carbon electrode modified with gold nanoparticles decorated on a molybdenum disulfide/chitosan (Au@MoS2/Ch) nanocomposite. This method was validated and showed limit of detection and limit of quantification values of 0.03 and 0.1 µM, respectively, with a detection range of 0.05–200 µM [54]. A method based on optical absorption was developed by Li et al for the rapid detection of L-cysteine with gold nanoparticles on a graphene oxide substrate, as sensitive nanoprobes.…”
Section: Nutrients and Bioactive Compoundsmentioning
confidence: 99%