“…Theposition of the desorption peak in the RD process can be considered as ameasure of the electrochemical stability of the SAM, reflecting ag lobal free energy change between the initial and final states.D oneux et al [9] proposed am ore realistic description for the reductive desorption process: [9][10][11] RS instead of the simplified Equation (1), where the aggregation state of every species is defined specifically. [9] Thus,t he energetic contributions that should be considered are the following:1 )substrate-adsorbate interaction (Au(hkl) À S; determined by the head-group/surface binding energy); 2) lateral interactions (C n /vdW Au(hkl) ;m ainly attractive vdW forces that contribute to stabilise the monolayer,shifting the RD potential towards more negative values); [12,13] 3) substrate/SAM-solvent (potential of zero charge of thiol-solvent interactions in the adsorbed state,p zc CnT-Au(hkl) ); 4) desorbed surfactant-solvent (C n /solvent;A Ts olvation energy);a nd 5) substrate-solvent, (pzc bare Au(hkl) ;d irectly dependent on the difference between the applied potential and the pzc of the bare gold surface). [9] Thec ontributions 1-3 are attributed to the initial state of the process described in Equation (2), whereas 4-5 are to the final state.Therefore,the RD potential peak depends on:…”