2018
DOI: 10.17159/0379-4350/2018/v71a21
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electrochemical determination of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid using bismuth film modified screen-printed carbon electrode

Abstract: In this work, the development of an electrochemical method for the determination of 2,4-dichlorophenoxy acetic acid (2,4-D) (indirectly by converting to its electroactive nitrated form) using a modified screen-printed carbon electrode with bismuth film is reported. The electrode modification has been done by a single potential step electrodeposition of bismuth film on screen-printed carbon electrodes. Under the optimized conditions, the nitrated 2,4-D showed a dynamic linear concentration range in pH 11 buffer… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The sensitivity of these methods is comparable to other electrochemical methods for 2,4-D determination described elsewhere. The LOD was found to be 0.08 µmol/L for graphitepolyurethane electrode [26], 0.2 µmol/L for R3ex activated carbon modified CPE [8], 0.23 µmol/L for mercury electrode [27], 0.400 µmol/L for silica-gel modified CPE [28], 0.7 µmol/L for Carboxen 1000 carbon molecular sieve modified CPE [8], 0.83 µmol/L for electrochemical sensor based on molecularly imprinted polypyrrole membranes [29], 0.98 µmol/L for F-300 activated carbon modified CPE [23], 1.14 µmol/L for SX-2 activated carbon modified CPE [23], 3.15 µmol/L for bismuth film modified screen-printed carbon electrode [30], and 3.4 µmol/L for Carbopack B carbon black modified CPE [8].…”
Section: Electroanalytical Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sensitivity of these methods is comparable to other electrochemical methods for 2,4-D determination described elsewhere. The LOD was found to be 0.08 µmol/L for graphitepolyurethane electrode [26], 0.2 µmol/L for R3ex activated carbon modified CPE [8], 0.23 µmol/L for mercury electrode [27], 0.400 µmol/L for silica-gel modified CPE [28], 0.7 µmol/L for Carboxen 1000 carbon molecular sieve modified CPE [8], 0.83 µmol/L for electrochemical sensor based on molecularly imprinted polypyrrole membranes [29], 0.98 µmol/L for F-300 activated carbon modified CPE [23], 1.14 µmol/L for SX-2 activated carbon modified CPE [23], 3.15 µmol/L for bismuth film modified screen-printed carbon electrode [30], and 3.4 µmol/L for Carbopack B carbon black modified CPE [8].…”
Section: Electroanalytical Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1,8,9 Some electroanalytical determinations of 2,4-D have been reported, almost all, however, has presented a limit of quantication higher than the maxima concentration of 2,4-D allowed by the WHO and USEPA (320 nmol L À1 ) or the CONAMA (140 nmol L À1 ) for drinking water. 1,3,5,[10][11][12][13][14] Moreover, some methods employ electrodes based on mercury, which is toxic in itself. 10 There is little information, however, about the electrochemical oxidation mechanism of the 2,4-D. 15 Thus, a non-toxic and sensitive electrochemical method is required, and the use of a borondoped diamond electrode (BDDE) is a good solution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%