2000
DOI: 10.1007/bf02757062
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electrochemical impedance of microelectrodes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is reported that the reactant diffusion coefficient can be estimated using the frequency at which the finite length Warburg impedance arcs are maximal on the Z 00 -axis. The maximum frequency (m m ) is proportional to the diffusion coefficient and inversely to the square of diffusion layer thickness d [36,42,45,48,51]. The diffusion coefficient is expressed as…”
Section: Estimation Of Mass Transport Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is reported that the reactant diffusion coefficient can be estimated using the frequency at which the finite length Warburg impedance arcs are maximal on the Z 00 -axis. The maximum frequency (m m ) is proportional to the diffusion coefficient and inversely to the square of diffusion layer thickness d [36,42,45,48,51]. The diffusion coefficient is expressed as…”
Section: Estimation Of Mass Transport Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, minus the imaginary part of the diffusion impedance, calculated at the apex of the Nyquist diagram, satisfies (ImZ c /R d ) Fp = 0.233 [40], therefore:…”
Section: Appendix a Faradaic Impedance Derived From Fleischmann And mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, using a computer algebra system like Mathematica [37], the low-frequency behaviour is readily obtained from the following limits: Next, the characteristic frequency corresponding to the apex of the diffusion impedance graph was given as u c,FP = 2.5 by Rotenberg et al [40], while Navarro-Laboulais et al [8] calculated numerically u c,FP = 2.5119. The more accurate value, u c,FP = 2.440, is proposed in this work [34].…”
Section: Appendix a Faradaic Impedance Derived From Fleischmann And mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These differences are characterized by the occurrence of an additional arc at high frequencies and resistances of 7-8 kΩ. The arc is distorted probably because of the reductive behavior of the ISE active mass and changes in the electrical conductivity of the surface film [7]. That film may have a multilayer structure, which complicates the data interpretation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…For convenience in comparing the data with other researches [2,3,7], we used out-of-system units for the ohmic component (R and θ) and the capacitative component (c in and c dl ) of the impedance, and also the electrochemical parameters (c 0 D 1/2 , j 0 ): Ω·cm 2 , F/cm 2 , A/cm 2 . Note.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%