simple picture, be considered as an electron on the more and a hole on the less electronegative chromophore. The key step in the photogeneration of charges in organic solar cell consists in the separation of this electron-hole pair against their mutual coulomb attraction. In a medium with a dielectric constant of 3.5, the Coulomb energy of opposite point charges with mutual separation of 1 nm is 410 meV. At room temperature, the associated Boltzmann factor for dissociation, expwould thus be about 10 −7 . On other hand, in an efficient solar cell composed of appropriate electron donor and acceptor materials the internal quantum efficiency can be close to 100%, [1] and is only weakly temperature dependent. [2] For example, Gao and co-workers report activation energies for charge separation that are as low as 25 meV for P3HT:PCBM when the film is disordered, and that decrease to 9 meV when the film is better ordered after an annealing step. [2a] Similarly, Kurpiers and co-workers report 23 meV for PCPDTBT:PCBM, i.e., also in the range of thermal energy at room temperature. [2b] How can both facts, i.e., the expected high binding energy of a localized electron-hole pair and the efficient, only weaklyThe high efficiencies reported for organic solar cells and an almost negligible thermal activation measured for the photogeneration of charge carriers have called into question whether photoinduced interfacial charge transfer states are bound by a significant coulomb attraction, and how this can be reconciled with very low activation energies. Here, this question is addressed in a combined experimental and theoretical approach. The interfacial binding energy of a charge-transfer state in a blend of MeLPPP:PCBM is determined by using energy resolved electrochemical impedance spectroscopy and is found to be about 0.5 eV. Temperature-dependent photocurrent measurements on the same films, however, give an activation energy that is about one order of magnitude lower. Using analytical calculations and Monte Carlo simulation the authors illustrate how i) interfacial energetics and ii) transport topology reduce the activation energy required to separate the interfacial electron-hole pair, with about equal contributions from both effects. The activation energy, however, is not reduced by entropy, although entropy increases the overall photodissociation yield.