2017
DOI: 10.1007/s00604-017-2342-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electrochemical indirect competitive immunoassay for ultrasensitive detection of zearalenone based on a glassy carbon electrode modified with carboxylated multi-walled carbon nanotubes and chitosan

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The sensitivity of the aptasensor for ZEN detection was significantly enhanced compared with that of most of other analytical techniques which are listed in Table S1. ,,, Also, the designed aptasensor had a wider linear range relative to the most of these approaches. Among these analytical techniques, the electrochemical indirect competitive immunoassay showed better LOD and linear range compared to our aptasensor.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The sensitivity of the aptasensor for ZEN detection was significantly enhanced compared with that of most of other analytical techniques which are listed in Table S1. ,,, Also, the designed aptasensor had a wider linear range relative to the most of these approaches. Among these analytical techniques, the electrochemical indirect competitive immunoassay showed better LOD and linear range compared to our aptasensor.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sensitivity of the aptasensor for ZEN detection was significantly enhanced compared with that of most of other analytical techniques which are listed in Table S1. ,,, Also, the designed aptasensor had a wider linear range relative to the most of these approaches. Among these analytical techniques, the electrochemical indirect competitive immunoassay showed better LOD and linear range compared to our aptasensor. However, this method needed 3.5 h analysis time and two kinds of antibodies, leading to the increase of the cost of analytical method, whereas the analysis time of our aptasensor was less than 2 h and the sensing agent was aptamer, leading to the decrease of the cost of sensing platform.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In recent years, immunoassay techniques, which are based on the highly specific molecular recognition of antigens by antibodies, have become an important analytical method in several fields [21,22]. Furthermore, many electrochemical immunosensors for food safety analysis were developed, due to the electrochemical methods provides several useful properties including the required detection limit, fast analysis times, low cost of the instrumentation, low sample and reagent consumption, portability, ease of use, high sensitivity and selectivity [23,24]. Screen-printing electrodes is one of the most promising approaches towards simple, rapid and inexpensive immunosensors production, and has advantages of flexibility design, automation process, and good reproducibility [25].…”
Section: A C C E P T E D Mmentioning
confidence: 99%