2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.hydromet.2021.105603
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electrochemical investigation of microbially and galvanically leached chalcopyrite

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Leaching rate decreasing sulfur and/or polysulfide layers were observed on acid-soluble sphalerite in the absence of sulfur oxidizers (Fowler and Crundwell 1998 ). Similar problems are known for chalcopyrite as well (Tanne and Schippers 2021 ). However, at appropriate redox potentials during bioleaching, inhibiting sulfur layers can be avoided.…”
Section: Sulfur Chemistry—implications For Bioleaching Kineticsmentioning
confidence: 57%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Leaching rate decreasing sulfur and/or polysulfide layers were observed on acid-soluble sphalerite in the absence of sulfur oxidizers (Fowler and Crundwell 1998 ). Similar problems are known for chalcopyrite as well (Tanne and Schippers 2021 ). However, at appropriate redox potentials during bioleaching, inhibiting sulfur layers can be avoided.…”
Section: Sulfur Chemistry—implications For Bioleaching Kineticsmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…However, chemically pure metal sulfides are not occurring under natural conditions (except if prepared in the lab). Thus, in practice always, mixed minerals are available, causing the generation of mixed reaction products (Sanhueza et al 1999 ; Dong et al 2022 ) and galvanic coupling (Tanne and Schippers 2021 ).…”
Section: Bioleaching Pathwaysmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This behavior is in agreement with the current understanding of galvanic interactions between metal sulfides. Indeed, as illustrated for instance by the measurements and literature review of Tanne and Schippers, the chalcopyrite rest potential is significantly lower than that of pyrite, and thus, chalcopyrite leaches preferentially than pyrite in the case of electrical contact between the two minerals. However, it has also been recently shown that, if the galvanic coupling can strongly enhance the chalcopyrite leaching rate at high temperature (e.g., at 80 °C in the Galvanox process), this effect is only marginal at moderate (20–30 °C) temperature. , As a consequence, it is very likely that the relatively high content of pyrite (12 wt %) in our concentrate did not induce a significant effect on chalcopyrite dissolution rate in our tests.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it has also been recently shown that, if the galvanic coupling can strongly enhance the chalcopyrite leaching rate at high temperature (e.g., at 80 °C in the Galvanox process 48 ), this effect is only marginal at moderate (20−30 °C) temperature. 47,49 As a consequence, it is very likely that the relatively high content of pyrite (12 wt %) in our concentrate did not induce a significant effect on chalcopyrite dissolution rate in our tests.…”
Section: Acs Engineeringmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Among other factors, it is caused by an increase in the rate of chemical reactions with increasing temperatures [36][37][38]. Moreover, an increase in the solubility of chalcopyrite in ferric sulfate solutions has been repeatedly shown at relatively low values of the redox potential [39][40][41]. Figure 2 indicates that the value of the redox potential was, on average, 100 mV less during bioleaching of the concentrate at 50 • C than at 40 • C. Choosing a more suitable temperature of these two and taking into account that the goal of bioleaching was to achieve the greatest removal of nickel and to obtain a high-grade copper concentrate as solids, a community growing at 40 • C should be selected.…”
Section: Pregnant Leach Solution Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%