1993
DOI: 10.1002/aic.690391014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electrochemical measurements of mass transfer at surfaces with discrete reactive areas

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Then, the Sherwood number is again close in value to its periodic counterpart. This observation is supported by the results of Juhasz & Deen (1993), who measured the limiting current generated at a rotating electrode patterned with reactive sites. It was found that the limiting current in a laminar flow (at Pe 1) depends subtly on the electrode distribution for small pattern coverages.…”
Section: Random Distribution Of Disks In a Periodic Systemsupporting
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Then, the Sherwood number is again close in value to its periodic counterpart. This observation is supported by the results of Juhasz & Deen (1993), who measured the limiting current generated at a rotating electrode patterned with reactive sites. It was found that the limiting current in a laminar flow (at Pe 1) depends subtly on the electrode distribution for small pattern coverages.…”
Section: Random Distribution Of Disks In a Periodic Systemsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…The flow field was assumed to be unidirectional and to have a general algebraic form, as the primary goal was to show that the local Péclet number affects the Sherwood number. They also performed experiments to this effect (Juhasz & Deen 1993). This exposed the shortcomings of the existing contemporary analysis of a series of problems related to mass transport to reactive spots in a non-adsorbing solid surface, where the Sherwood number was calculated using the stagnant-film approximation around the reactive region, i.e.…”
Section: General Problem Statementmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The problem of trapping of diffusing particles by heterogeneous boundaries, with absorbing regions on the otherwise reflecting surfaces, arises in the analysis of various processes in physics, chemistry, and biology. Examples include electric current through arrays of microelectrodes, [1][2][3] porous membrane transport, [4][5][6] reactions on supported catalysts, 7 water exchange in plants, 8 ligand binding to cell surface receptors, [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18] ligand accumulation in cell culture assays, 19,20 to mention just a few. This is an extremely complicated problem, because it involves non-uniform boundary conditions on the surface.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To address this problem, Yang and Lewandowski (1995) developed a microtechnique to evaluate the local mass transfer coefficient in biofilms by measuring the limiting current drawn from a mobile microelectrode. The limiting current technique, based on the reduction of dissolved electroactive species at a cathodically polarized electrode, is often used to determine mass transfer rates to surfaces (Dawson and Trass, 1972;Hanratty, 1991;Juhasz and Deen, 1993). The concept of local mass transport coefficient introduced by Yang and Lewandowski (1995) results directly from the limiting current technique with the exception of using a mobile electrode, instead of a stationary one, to measure the limiting current.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%