2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.coelec.2021.100806
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electrochemical oxidation technology to treat textile wastewaters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
33
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 95 publications
0
33
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The standard water treatment solutions cannot effectively decolorize dyes because of their complex chemical structure and resistance to oxidizing chemicals and light. Hence, these dyes are processed using a variety of procedures commonly employed in industrial effluent treatment, such as membrane process (Liu et al, 2020;Rashidi et al, 2015), solidification (Khayat and Zali-Boeini, 2019), ion exchange (Joseph et al, 2020), electrochemical oxidation (Rodríguez-Narváez et al, 2021), and absorption (Nouri et al, 2021;Saleh et al, 2021). However, among present treatment methods, adsorption is the most effective solution for removing contaminants from an aquatic environment due to its ease of usage and high efficiency (Nodehi et al, 2022;Sarbisheh et al, 2017;Tran et al, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The standard water treatment solutions cannot effectively decolorize dyes because of their complex chemical structure and resistance to oxidizing chemicals and light. Hence, these dyes are processed using a variety of procedures commonly employed in industrial effluent treatment, such as membrane process (Liu et al, 2020;Rashidi et al, 2015), solidification (Khayat and Zali-Boeini, 2019), ion exchange (Joseph et al, 2020), electrochemical oxidation (Rodríguez-Narváez et al, 2021), and absorption (Nouri et al, 2021;Saleh et al, 2021). However, among present treatment methods, adsorption is the most effective solution for removing contaminants from an aquatic environment due to its ease of usage and high efficiency (Nodehi et al, 2022;Sarbisheh et al, 2017;Tran et al, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Essentially, there are two different types of EO mechanisms: direct and indirect oxidation approaches [ 24 , 25 ]. Although direct oxidation is feasible under specific conditions, in some processes, indirect oxidation can become dominant when non-active electrodes (such as boron-doped diamond (BDD), PbO 2 , or Ti 4 O 7 ) are used, because these are considered the most efficient anodes for oxidizing pollutants in water due to their high potential for the electrogeneration of a great amount of heterogenous free hydroxyl radicals ( • OH) and/or other oxidants [ 26 , 27 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The higher the OEP, the more efficient is the electrode for complete oxidation of organic pollutants. When the OEP of the anode is lower than the direct electron transfer potential of organic pollutants, the oxygen evolution reaction occurs first in the anode during the electrolysis (Rodriguez-Narvaez et al 2021). This reduces the rate of • OH generated and the current efficiency, and prolongs the electrolysis duration, resulting in higher energy consumption (Muddemann et al 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%