2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.corsci.2018.01.043
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electrochemical performance of reinforcing steel in alkali-activated slag extract in the presence of chlorides

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
21
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
2
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The E corr for steel in test solution without inhibitor is about −300 mV SCE , and has almost no change after adding 500 ppm CLS into the test solution, which is consistent with previous research [ 1 ]. This result indicates that CLS act as a mixed-type corrosion inhibitor [ 24 , 25 ]. Meanwhile, after adding 500 ppm inorganic inhibitors, the E corr of steel slightly increases, and molybdate leads the largest increase of E corr .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The E corr for steel in test solution without inhibitor is about −300 mV SCE , and has almost no change after adding 500 ppm CLS into the test solution, which is consistent with previous research [ 1 ]. This result indicates that CLS act as a mixed-type corrosion inhibitor [ 24 , 25 ]. Meanwhile, after adding 500 ppm inorganic inhibitors, the E corr of steel slightly increases, and molybdate leads the largest increase of E corr .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meanwhile, after adding 500 ppm inorganic inhibitors, the E corr of steel slightly increases, and molybdate leads the largest increase of E corr . This result reveals that the tested inorganic inhibitors act as a mixed-type inhibitor [ 25 , 26 ] predominantly with anodic effectiveness [ 26 ]. The inhibition efficiency (IE%) was calculated by the following equation: where i 0 corr and i corr represent the corrosion current density values in test solution without and with inhibitor, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Considering the effect of inhibitors on capacitance, a substantial decrease in Cdl can be observed and the double‐layer capacitance can be expressed as follows: italicCdl=italicY0(italicωmax)n−1,where ωmax is the frequency at which the imaginary part of the impedance is at maximum. Generally, the decrease in Cdl is due to the reducing local dielectric constant for the displacement of water and/or thickening electric double layer . The CPE can be expressed as follows: italicZCPE=italicY01(jω)n,where Y0 is the proportional factor, normalω is the angular frequency, j = 1 and n is the phase shift which are regarded as a measure of the heterogeneity and roughness of the electrode surface.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, the decrease in Cdl is due to the reducing local dielectric constant for the displacement of water and/or thickening electric double layer . The CPE can be expressed as follows: italicZCPE=italicY01(jω)n,where Y0 is the proportional factor, normalω is the angular frequency, j = 1 and n is the phase shift which are regarded as a measure of the heterogeneity and roughness of the electrode surface. While n = 0, the CPE represents a pure resistor; for n = 1, an inductor; and for n =+1, a pure capacitor.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%